|
|
Post by SuperNaturalX on Jul 30, 2009 21:18:22 GMT -5
WWE released Brain Kendrick today. Someone needs to hunt him down and sign him for LOW.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrathchild on Jul 30, 2009 21:20:28 GMT -5
Only if his card is released as "Spanky"  |
|
Wraith
Infinity Challenge
Posts: 33
|
Post by Wraith on Jul 30, 2009 21:39:17 GMT -5
Eh, I'd rather see focus on LEGENDS ... Though admittedly its not his fault and he needs a second chance as I didn't like his gimmick but did like him with London
|
|
|
|
Post by wrathchild on Jul 30, 2009 21:57:39 GMT -5
London & Kendrick would make for an excellent addition to either LOW of LotF, though I prefer LotF.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2009 3:36:32 GMT -5
I'd like to see Kendrick if the art was him with his ghetto Jerry Lawler jacket strutting to the ring. Eh, I'd rather see focus on LEGENDS ... Though admittedly its not his fault and he needs a second chance as I didn't like his gimmick but did like him with London So...what makes Danny Doring more of a Legend than Kendrick, exactly? I mean, Kendrick's wrestled all over the world, made it to the WWE, had one of the longest WWE Tag Title runs in years. Doring, did none of that (job matches on WWECW do not count). |
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncross on Jul 31, 2009 7:23:21 GMT -5
Brian Kendrick fits more with LotF then LOW, and I really rather not see him in the game...
|
|
|
|
Post by Gunslinger on Jul 31, 2009 7:54:25 GMT -5
I'd be fine with Kendrick in either, preferrably with Paul London. Besides, it's not like its against the law to use someone from an LoW set with LotF wrestlers.
|
|
|
|
Post by executioner on Jul 31, 2009 8:16:43 GMT -5
I have no problems with Kendrick being added. And if you mix and match LOW and LOTF at all, he will fit in just fine. I mean c'mon, its not like he is going to beat Race or get a huge Rahl rating.  |
|
|
|
Post by smathis on Jul 31, 2009 10:05:02 GMT -5
London & Kendrick would be a great tag-team addition to LOW. I think they'd deserve to be released with LOW.
But I'd put them in my LOTF fed, where Danielson, RVD, Sandman, Sabu, Doring and others currently reside. I usually reserve my LOW fed for old school wrestlers. While the hardcore and jumpier modern cruiserweights go to LOTF.
Makes more sense for me to divide them by style and era than whether or not I think they deserve to be "legends".
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Jul 31, 2009 12:27:19 GMT -5
I'd be fine with Kendrick in either, preferrably with Paul London. Besides, it's not like its against the law to use someone from an LoW set with LotF wrestlers. Exactly. And because Knapik does a good job making sure the LotF cards are designed to work well with the LOW cards (otherwise the top LotF wrestlers would probably have stats as strong as Gotch, Race, Rogers, Bockwinkel, etc), it should probably be about the same card anyway in terms of strength. So if that's the case, it really doesn't matter whether we would get someone like Kendrick in LOW of LotF. (For the record, IMO Kendrick would be a better fit in a LOW set because he spent something like 6 years in the WWE and along with Paul London had the longest reign as WWE Tag Team Champions since that title was created in 2002. But, like with Danielson, it's not something I'm going to stress about because the card should be about the same anyway interms of strength and I would just be happy to get the card released either way and then decide for myself whether to use it in LOW or in LotF or both). |
|
