derekvb
Infinity Challenge
Posts: 135
|
Post by derekvb on Nov 8, 2018 19:53:48 GMT -5
Has anybody posted the Dahl ratings for the GWF Originals sets 3 & 4? I did a search on the forums but could only find for the first two sets. Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
bloodsport3000
Infinity Challenge
Did anyone else send in a female?
Posts: 122
|
Post by bloodsport3000 on Dec 3, 2018 16:33:44 GMT -5
I just looked at the official Rahl Ratings for Death Knight (original set) and it shows -8(-1).
I ran it through my calculator as -9(-2), not sure if the ratings were taking away a point for the level 1 offense - 3 (AG) move.
Anyway, Death Knight in the Set #3 has a few changes. He gets 3 more point on LVL 3 Offense, and an extra point for a lower DQ rating.
So, by my calculations he is a -5(+2).
I will look at the others for any variances later on.
|
|
bloodsport3000
Infinity Challenge
Did anyone else send in a female?
Posts: 122
|
Post by bloodsport3000 on Dec 3, 2018 17:23:35 GMT -5
I use the basic Rahl rules posted on 2/8/08 2:11 am by Joseph-Guest if you want to search them up.
Sets #3 & #4 digital sets
Rating Name (+/- better than the original 2087 digital Set)
45, 46 Massif (+5)
26, 32 Killer Queen (+4)
23, 29 Pit Viper (+1)
23, 27 Renegade (+4)
20, 23 Executioner (+1)
11, 25 Ghengis Khan (-2)
10, 19 Pulsar (+1)
9, 10 Mutant (+1)
8, 14 Vanity (No change)
-4, 9 Beast-Rider (+1)
-5, 2 Death Knight (+4)
-6, 1 Omega (+4)
Ratings for original 2087 set for comparison were completed by the same Rahl calculator for consistency.
|
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Dec 3, 2018 17:40:13 GMT -5
hmm only Ghengis is worse.
|
|
bloodsport3000
Infinity Challenge
Did anyone else send in a female?
Posts: 122
|
Post by bloodsport3000 on Dec 7, 2018 15:21:34 GMT -5
I'm going to redo these... found one cell in defense level 2 that was hardkeyed "Down-3"... these might be off.
|
|
