Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 1:26:15 GMT -5
The title pretty much says it all. I was running a tag team tournament using the PBP Sim at the hospital the other day, and had to replace Reno Scum (with NRG, if anyone is curious) because I could not load Thornstowe's 2016 Promoter Prime card.
Apologies if this is in the wrong area.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Jul 10, 2019 6:22:51 GMT -5
This issue has been resolved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2019 9:33:36 GMT -5
This issue has been resolved. Thank you! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2019 11:17:58 GMT -5
Hi there. I apologize if there is a more appropriate forum where I should have posted this.
On Matt Riddle's online card from the Evolve 3 set, his Level 3 Offense is as follows:
1. belly to belly suplex - 3
2. jumping knee strike - 3 (ch G)
3. out of the ring (c)
4. triangle choke - 3
...and so on.
My question is regarding his belly-to-belly suplex at Move #1. Is it supposed to be a move-3? If so, I would think it would come after the out of the ring (c) option. Is it possible its supposed to be a move-2?
It just looks odd to me; I don't know if I've seen that particular configuration of moves before.
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Jul 25, 2019 11:54:32 GMT -5
Hi there. I apologize if there is a more appropriate forum where I should have posted this. On Matt Riddle's online card from the Evolve 3 set, his Level 3 Offense is as follows: 1. belly to belly suplex - 3 2. jumping knee strike - 3 (ch G) 3. out of the ring (c) 4. triangle choke - 3 ...and so on. My question is regarding his belly-to-belly suplex at Move #1. Is it supposed to be a move-3? If so, I would think it would come after the out of the ring (c) option. Is it possible its supposed to be a move-2? It just looks odd to me; I don't know if I've seen that particular configuration of moves before. Thanks in advance! I wrote the stats for that card and it should be a 2. The printed card does have it correct as a 2. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2019 12:04:36 GMT -5
That's what I thought. the "-3" just didn't make sense.
Thanks for the quick response!
|
|
|
|
Post by luke929 on Jul 26, 2019 16:39:35 GMT -5
I just had Melina debut for my fed, and I noticed that her artwork is oriented in portrait mode in the game table instead of landscape and so it looks distorted. It should look the same as Gorgeous George... Please look into this Mike MThanks! Edit... I guess the right way to put it is that the artwork is squished to fit the area, as opposed to staying in it's original proportions... |
|
|
|
Post by luke929 on Jul 30, 2019 0:10:15 GMT -5
Whoever fixed it... Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by desmotic on Jul 30, 2019 9:28:57 GMT -5
In the PBP Simulator the card for Battering Ram 2088 is listed as the Reimagined version, for 2088 through 2097. I have no idea how different the Reimagined version is from the original version but it should probably be changed back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Jul 30, 2019 14:09:43 GMT -5
The right version of the card was being used, but the name was displaying incorrectly. Issue has been corrected.
|
|
