|
Post by LAWraith on Aug 2, 2020 10:00:42 GMT -5
Came into 2099 guns blazing and apparently so did the new LAW Heavyweight champion Vengeance. He has come along and looked to end people. He and the gladiators viciously beat down Spike to start the year. He then attacked Splatter and beat him up even getting DQ'd after originally winning the match. Now he beat and bloodied the Matador taking him out for 2 weeks. The commissioner has had to draw a line in the sand and said no more attacks after the match, respect the bell being rung.
If Vengeance attacks again should I strip him of the title? I have never been the biggest fan of declaring vacancies but I also dont want a crazy person injuring the whole roster lol. Matador is very lucky it's only two weeks as I rolled snake eyes. What do you guys think? I would also say its the perfect time as MegaTournament is fast approaching ...
|
|
|
Post by walkswithwolf on Aug 2, 2020 10:11:04 GMT -5
Hm,the Champion represents the Federation....
|
|
|
Post by foxone1 on Aug 2, 2020 10:17:16 GMT -5
Make an example of him.
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Aug 2, 2020 10:22:13 GMT -5
Take the belt away.
|
|
|
Post by Pariah on Aug 2, 2020 10:29:48 GMT -5
If Vengeance feels the need to wipe out the roster, he shouldn't be rewarded with a title belt... The commissioner has to take a stand in this case and SHUT IT DOWN!
|
|
|
Post by throwingtoasters on Aug 2, 2020 10:52:44 GMT -5
I wouldnโt strip him of the title but I would have the commissioner throw everything he/she possibly can at Vengeance. He attacks a wrestler? Automatic title shot for that wrestler or member of the attacked wrestlerโs team. And by automatic I mean immediately after the attack while, presumably, Vengeance is still recovering from the match too. I wouldnโt strip him of the title but make it very hard to hold on to.
|
|
|
Post by Thomas (TK) on Aug 2, 2020 10:56:49 GMT -5
I'm not sure which way I want to vote as I hate vacating a title... However, Vengeance has gone above and beyond marring the championship... I agree with throwingtoasters that the Commissioner should put him in a series of matches...matxhes that favor the challenger...or maybe even an elimination chamber with him being the first entrant. Just my two cents...
|
|
|
Post by LAWraith on Aug 2, 2020 11:53:42 GMT -5
So one thought I had was something I think WWE did to Roman Reigns ... MEGATOURNAMENT is coming up, instead of the winner going on to face Vengeance at CIVIL WAR he may defend the title against every opponent he faces meaning he has to win MegaTournament in order to retain the title basically.
|
|
|
Post by LAWraith on Aug 2, 2020 12:29:46 GMT -5
Kind of going off thoughts since Vengeance did it again ... at MegaTournament every match Vengeance has the title will be on the line, if he gets dqโd or counted out the title will go to the winner. Opponents have no DQ against Vengeance.
|
|
|
Post by Pariah on Aug 2, 2020 12:47:27 GMT -5
Kind of going off thoughts since Vengeance did it again ... at MegaTournament every match Vengeance has the title will be on the line, if he gets dqโd or counted out the title will go to the winner. Opponents have no DQ against Vengeance. I can honestly say that I've never been a fan of the 'title changes hands on a technical decision' stipulation... But, in this case, an exception may be needed.
|
|