|
|
Post by talison on Aug 1, 2010 18:29:37 GMT -5
Picked it up at the local grocery store right now. Just barely flipped through it.
Nigel has jobbed a lot in TNA, but his first two months he had stellar matches with Kurt Angle and even in loosing he's looked good.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucifer on Aug 7, 2010 8:09:51 GMT -5
I'm not hating, but how can Nigel be so high when all he's done is jobbed out on TNA since he's been there...Bryan was the same way on NXT...he only one like once before being released...I wish these 2 would have been treated better when they got there...I can see it in Bryan's case, but Nigel getting misused like that is a shame. Rankings were based on performances from June 1st, 2009 thru May 31st, 2010, giving both McGuinness & Danielson roughly 4 months worth of ROH time. I'm guessing Nigel's first couple of months in TNA must have scored alot of points with PWI, because he was fairly inactive due to injuries towards the end of his ROH tenure, and had already dropped the ROH title when the rankings period had begun. In all fairness to PWI, they did drop him 22 spots from 2009, which is pretty significant for the first 100 wrestlers on the list. Danielson at #44 is definitely more perplexing, as he only fell 17 spots & through no fault of his own, was made to look ridiculous during his WWE tenure. In fact, I found it downright insulting as a wrestling fan the way that Vince & Co. presented him. In fact, I'm still not 100% sure WWE's initial signing of McGuinness & Danielson was nothing more than an attempt to try & bury ROH & that WWE would have probably done the same thing to Nigel had they not voided the deal. Regardless, I agree with you, they both deserved better treatment after their years of hard work. Thankfully, true wrestling fans can appreciate & respect what both bring to the table. Unfortunately for them, their wrestling ability doesn't carry much weight with the WWE target audience of 8 year old kids. At least TNA is giving Nigel an action figure  |
|
