|
Post by swarm on Aug 19, 2011 6:50:14 GMT -5
and the best part - if Sting wins --- wait for it --- he gets to fight Hogan. Oh, but is Sting loses to Flair --- Sting has to retire. Can you believe it? 52 year old Sting forced to retire. Wow.
Flair says if he wins, Sting has to retire, but if Sting actually beat him, he will serve Hulk to him on a silver platter. Flair tells him to think about it, because he means a real retirement, and he has to go home, then he asks for an answer. Sting says he wants to ask the fans, then tells Flair he smells like garlic, but the match is on!
Let's not even get into the absurdity of Ric Flair saying anything about a "real retirement".
TNA. WRESTLING MATTERS! Just in case you forgot.
Horrible.
What do you even say to this?
|
|
|
Post by jasonjaconetti on Aug 19, 2011 6:53:41 GMT -5
Every time TNA takes one step forward, they take two steps back. The X-Division stuff is great to see, but the Sting-Hogan/Flair stuff...UGGHHHH!
|
|
|
Post by jasonjaconetti on Aug 19, 2011 6:54:46 GMT -5
And the kicker is, that I am a TNA fan. Watch it every week. Went to the house show when they were in Danbury. Buy the DVDs. Just makes me shake my head sometimes
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Cross on Aug 19, 2011 7:00:48 GMT -5
It's to the point for me I don't even watch it anymore, I'll read the spoilers and that's it. I'll watch my dvd's ( 70 episodes ) of iMPACT! from it's Spike TV debut from 2005 forward and the official DVD's I have over today's stuff and to me TNA was more original in 2005 & 2006...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2011 7:05:14 GMT -5
WOW! This is a huge main event match-up!
For 1989.
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Aug 19, 2011 8:29:56 GMT -5
What's up with you ? Its brill aint it ! NO I'm joking . Does it surprise anyone ? Sting , Flair and Hogan just can not call it a day at all . Sting can't retire . As he billed as mian event on January 2012 UK Tour ?
|
|
|
Post by Vidtek on Aug 19, 2011 8:38:28 GMT -5
Wow, while one promotion is building up it's anual tournament to showcase up and coming young stars in pro-wrestling...TNA gives us the main event from World War 3 '95! Way to go Terry, Eric and Vince, you guys sure know what fans want to see.
|
|
|
Post by todd on Aug 19, 2011 8:46:00 GMT -5
You mean the same Sting who turned down a match against the Undertaker at Wrestlemania ?
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Aug 19, 2011 9:09:32 GMT -5
You mean the same Sting who turned down a match against the Undertaker at Wrestlemania ? That's the worst part too. This is what he gave it up for. A match vs. a drug addict (on drugs), a joker gimmick, and matches with Flair and Hogan in 2011, in front of 500 people who are given free tickets. I really do wonder if years from now Sting will tell all on what exactly stopped him from taking the offer to fight Undertaker at Mania. I really think the truth is Sting doesn't believe in himself anymore (and maybe rightfully). He sees UT vs. HBK and UT vs. HHH and he feels that he can't even come close to doing that. He's more comfortable flopping around like the joker in TNA, hitting people with baseball bats, and getting in the ring with others guys that can't wrestle anymore either. I wonder if he will ever admit that. Sting is obviously another guy who can't get out of the business. It happens to the best of them. And that's sad considering the legacy Sting built for himself. He's kinda like a young Randy the Ram. We might be talking about Sting the same way in a few years the way we're talking about Flair and Hogan today. Total jokes. After all, he's happy to work for Hogan and wrestle him in 2011. Writing is on the wall fans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2011 9:11:29 GMT -5
You mean the same Sting who turned down a match against the Undertaker at Wrestlemania ? Why would Sting want to go to Mania just to job and be another notch in Taker's belt? With that said, the idiocy of TNA never ceases to amaze me. Go outta business already.
|
|