|
|
Post by subvert69 on Jan 2, 2012 19:29:52 GMT -5
I just read this from The Wrestling Globe Newsletter:
Following his first round defeat at UFC 141 this past weekend in Las Vegas, Brock Lesnar announced his retirement from MMA. He retires under contract to the UFC so will be unable to work with WWE or any other companies without permission. Tons of rumors are already floating around, but to kill the most prominent one, Undertaker is locked in to work with Triple H at Wrestlemania.
Not sure if this is true but personally I don't want another Triple H and Undertaker match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Cross on Jan 2, 2012 19:46:44 GMT -5
I've seen Dana White reply with on regards to Brock "We'll see if he'll be involved with the WWE" and also HHH not only mentioned a rematch after this years WM, but again hinting at it late last year and also add the rumors HBK will be the special referee for their WM match this year. I think we'll most likely see HHH vs. Undertaker this year...
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix on Jan 3, 2012 20:56:51 GMT -5
HBK even mentioned ref' ing the match on twitter, but i couldn't figure if he was just making fun of rumors' or was serious.
It would be cool to see that match set, and then Leznar show up and take out HHH and wrestle UT.
It would also be cool if he showed up at WrestleMania, and took out Cena, after his match with Rock.
|
|
|
|
Post by offspring515 on Jan 7, 2012 7:18:49 GMT -5
They are already going to get their buyrate with Rock/Cena. I think Lesnar/Taker would be saved for another time if it ever happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Jan 7, 2012 8:26:50 GMT -5
Most likely Lesnar won't appear before next year...you don't rush too many one time matchups on the same card. Lesnar's going to need time to recover anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 7, 2012 10:31:10 GMT -5
Is there really any question? Human pile HHH will be fighting IT again at Mania. 3 times a charm after all, even if you act like the first one never happened. May as well get HBK involved too cause that's what Mania is all about, the old guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sinclair Promotions on Jan 9, 2012 8:19:23 GMT -5
In my humble opinion, the ONLY reason to involve HBK in a third Taker v HHH match is if it leads in a HBK v the loser, which will probably once again be HHH. I can't see Taker or Vince for that matter throwing away the streak just to feed HHH's ego.
|
|
