Post by Sickman on Jul 22, 2008 13:45:21 GMT -5
**updated version**
To qualify for the rankings; take the number of total matches and divide by the number of total competitors. The number you come up with is how many matches a wrestler would have to compete in to qualify. (EX. 538 total single matches divided by 28 competittors=19 matches a wrestler needs to qualify) This prevents rookies or wrestlers that haven't had as many matches from getting into the rankings based on a perfect record after 1 or 2 matches.
Rankings are figured after every 3 month period.
At the beginning of a new year, half of a wrestlers exsisting point total is carried over. If a wrestler was not qualified to be ranked, his points are cut in half twice. For instance, a 40 would become a 10 instead of a 20. Records are reset.
100%=100
95%-99.9%=95
90%-94.9%=90
85%-89.9%=85
80%-84.9%=80
75%-79.9%=75
70%-74.9%=70
65%-69.9%=65
60%-64.9%=60
55%-59.9%=55
50%-54.9%=50
45%-49.9%=35
40%-44.9%=30
35%-39.9%=25
30%-34.9%=20
25%-29.9%=15
20%-24.9%=10
15%-19.9%=8
10%-14.9%=5
0%-9.9%=1
**Every 10 wins= 10 points
**Every 10 losses= -5 points
**GWF Championship won= 50 points
**GWF Championship defended successfully= 25 points
**GWF Championship lost= -30 points
**Intergalactic Championship won= 30 points
**Intergalactic Championship defended successfully= 20 points
**I.G. Championship lost= -20 points
**GWF Tag Team Titles won= 50 points
**GWF Tag Team Titles defended successfully= 25 points
**GWF Tag Team Titles Lost= -30 points
**GWF Womens Title won= 50 points
**GWF Womens Title defended successfully= 25 points
**GWF Womens Title lost= -30 points
**Outside the top 15 w/win vs. top 10= +10 pts
**Inside the top 10 w/loss vs. Bottom 15= -10 pts
Explanation: Under my old system; a wrestler recieved points just for winning. Well; if said wrestler had more matches than anyone else, of course he/she had a chance to secure more points than anyone else. Hopefully this system is "weighted" more for quality than quantity.
Of course feedback is appreciated.
To qualify for the rankings; take the number of total matches and divide by the number of total competitors. The number you come up with is how many matches a wrestler would have to compete in to qualify. (EX. 538 total single matches divided by 28 competittors=19 matches a wrestler needs to qualify) This prevents rookies or wrestlers that haven't had as many matches from getting into the rankings based on a perfect record after 1 or 2 matches.
Rankings are figured after every 3 month period.
At the beginning of a new year, half of a wrestlers exsisting point total is carried over. If a wrestler was not qualified to be ranked, his points are cut in half twice. For instance, a 40 would become a 10 instead of a 20. Records are reset.
100%=100
95%-99.9%=95
90%-94.9%=90
85%-89.9%=85
80%-84.9%=80
75%-79.9%=75
70%-74.9%=70
65%-69.9%=65
60%-64.9%=60
55%-59.9%=55
50%-54.9%=50
45%-49.9%=35
40%-44.9%=30
35%-39.9%=25
30%-34.9%=20
25%-29.9%=15
20%-24.9%=10
15%-19.9%=8
10%-14.9%=5
0%-9.9%=1
**Every 10 wins= 10 points
**Every 10 losses= -5 points
**GWF Championship won= 50 points
**GWF Championship defended successfully= 25 points
**GWF Championship lost= -30 points
**Intergalactic Championship won= 30 points
**Intergalactic Championship defended successfully= 20 points
**I.G. Championship lost= -20 points
**GWF Tag Team Titles won= 50 points
**GWF Tag Team Titles defended successfully= 25 points
**GWF Tag Team Titles Lost= -30 points
**GWF Womens Title won= 50 points
**GWF Womens Title defended successfully= 25 points
**GWF Womens Title lost= -30 points
**Outside the top 15 w/win vs. top 10= +10 pts
**Inside the top 10 w/loss vs. Bottom 15= -10 pts
Explanation: Under my old system; a wrestler recieved points just for winning. Well; if said wrestler had more matches than anyone else, of course he/she had a chance to secure more points than anyone else. Hopefully this system is "weighted" more for quality than quantity.
Of course feedback is appreciated.
