Daniel Bryan Yes or No ?

[Bazzy]

Which is better by Daniel Bryan ? Yes Yes Yes or No No No ?

[Justin Case]

I think he was way over with the Yes chants than with the No chants right now.

[Bazzy]

Pesona I think No No No is better ?

[swarm]

YES! YES! YES! was a phenomena that (of course) WWE failed to capitalize on. I never understand why WWE fails to put the belts on the guys the fans love the most. It's almost defiant the way they ignore (and often create) fan reaction. I like ADR a lot, but he'll never be half as over as DB was/is.

In fact, this theory leads me to believe that both Sheamus and CM Punk will both retain their titles until Wrestlemania. With Sheamus, I'm 100% sure of it. If you count the PPV's, he's got 7 more defenses. He's going on his 3rd with ADR where he is sure to retain. I'll predict at least 3 PPV defenses vs. Orton, 2 more vs. Ziggler (Ziggler won't win the belt) and a W in the Elimination Chamber. I think this sets up 1 of two things:

1) Sheamus (c) vs. Taker/Title vs. Streak at Mania.

or, if they decide to go with Cena vs. Taker at Mania (please!)

2) Sheamus vs. Royal Rumble winner Daniel Bryan for the 3rd Mania in a row, where DB finally exacts revenge for his 16 second loss to Sheamus last year, and finally gets the WM moment he deserves.

NO! NO! NO! is funny as hell too, cause DB is the best in the business right now, but YES! YES! YES! was better.

[Shon Maxx]

or, if they decide to go with Cena vs. Taker at Mania (please!)

I doubt that. The fans will not boo UT, so the only other option is to turn Cena heel. We'll have a better chance of getting a Diva's division with divas who actually wrestle.

Sept 3, 2012 16:30:04 GMT -5 Swarm said:

2) Sheamus vs. Royal Rumble winner Daniel Bryan for the 3rd Mania in a row, where DB finally exacts revenge for his 16 second loss to Sheamus last year, and finally gets the WM moment he deserves.

Also don't forget about getting kicked completely from WM the previous year, in a match with the same guy. I know I'd be ticked off.

[Vegas]

both are great when being done by Daniel Bryan (but IMO usually really annoying when done by fans at non WWE wrestling events.)

for the poll I voted Yes Yes Yes as the popularity of Yes Yes Yes was what led to No No No.

[swarm]

Sept 3, 2012 16:59:06 GMT -5 Shon Maxx said:

I doubt that. The fans will not boo UT, so the only other option is to turn Cena heel. We'll have a better chance of getting a Diva's division with divas who actually ..

They didn't boo Taker vs. HHH or HBK, or HHH or HBK vs Cena. I don't think they are trying to create a heel vs hero scenario w Taker at Mania anymore especially after 4 straight face v face match ups last 4 years. If they go w Sheamus vs Taker that's fave vs face too barring any unforeseen heel turn by Sheamus.

[Tournament Master]

Gotta be the YES chant...it even leaks over to MLB...

[Phoenix]

YESYESYES! was better. there's no real reason why Bryan is chanting NO! I mean when the GM does something he doesn't like, okay, but to just come out chanting that doesn't make sense. To me it's just a way of reversing it on him and keeping him Heel, but whatever they do he's still OVER with the crowd.

[LWPD]

Sept 2, 2012 9:05:22 GMT -5 Bazzy said:

Which is better by Daniel Bryan ? Yes Yes Yes or No No No ?

I'd go with the 'Yes' chant. DB has admitted to finding inspiration from MMA fighter Diego Sanchez, who credited the idea to motivational speaker/entrepreneur Tony Robbins. The technique is called state pumping. Repeating simple positive word affirmations in unison (ie. chanting 'yes' repeatedly) tends to be a hit with mass audiences. The 'no' chant is just a contrarian heel antic, it lacks the same type of firepower.

Tony Robbins Trains Yes Chant State Pumping At A Seminar


Tony Robbins Fire Walk w/ Yes Chant State Pump