|
Post by LWPD on Oct 20, 2012 17:12:08 GMT -5
Another interesting piece from wwe.com, this time on the topic of the best 'big men' in WWE history. The stated criteria focused on talent that was (kayfabed/legit) 6'7 or taller, and/or 300 lbs or heavier. Rankings are below, bios are available at the link: Courtesy of WWE.com Top 25 Big Men In WWE HistoryThe bigger they are...the harder they hit. At least that's true of the 25 men on this list. From towering giants to earthshaking behemoths, these Superstars possess uncommon size and strength backed by the power and ability to win. What makes a giant? For the purpose of this Top 25, it's a Superstar who is either 6-foot-7 and up or more than 300 pounds. Many of them are both. All of them are destroyers.
25. Rikishi 24. Mike Awesome 23. Big Daddy V 22. One Man Gang 21. Mark Henry 20. Haystacks Calhoun 19. Great Khali 18. Kamala 17. King Kong Bundy 16. Bruiser Brody 15. Umaga 14. Big John Studd 13. Earthquake 12. Killer Kowalski 11. Bam Bam Bigelow 10. Sid 9. Vader 8. Diesel 7. Big Cat Ernie Ladd 6. Kane 5. Gorilla Monsoon 4. Yokozuna 3. Big Show 2. Andre The Giant 1. Undertaker
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Oct 20, 2012 19:36:16 GMT -5
Well I disagree with 3, 4, and 6 being that high, but about as good a list as you'll get from WWE really.
Of course I'd put Andre #1, but I can see why they put Taker #1 and he's definitely not a bad choice.
|
|
|
Post by mikefortune on Nov 8, 2012 23:17:56 GMT -5
Not a big fan of him but don't you think Hogan should be on this list?
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Nov 9, 2012 10:27:09 GMT -5
Well him or Andre......yeah.
|
|
|
Post by marktaggart on Nov 9, 2012 17:31:25 GMT -5
Not a big fan of him but don't you think Hogan should be on this list? Well, I suppose you have to figure out the criteria. Does Hogan transcend this tag? I don't know; it's just another silly list. Troy, Yokozuna was deserving of that #4 placing in my opinion. At his peak, he was an incredible wrestler for his size. To me, Big John Studd showing up on this list where he does is just sentimentality. Studd was not good in the ring. He had a little bit of personality, but his main draw was that he was----big. By all accounts he was a great guy, and I want to take nothing away from him being remembered as a part of the 80s expansion era, but memory seems to be kind to him in this instance. ESPECIALLY considering Bruiser Brody checks in at 16. Objectively, Brody would be in the top five easily if this was serious.
|
|
|
Post by justme on Nov 9, 2012 17:38:39 GMT -5
To truly make this list credible, I believe there should be a second list that is put up during softball season that excludes Sid...
|
|
allnitelong
Infinity Challenge
I am back after a long absence...Trying to get back to COTG and soon Legends of Wrestling
Posts: 126
|
Post by allnitelong on Nov 9, 2012 19:28:51 GMT -5
I know Andre should be #1 . He only lost IF he wanted to Hogan knows that more than anyone...
|
|