|
|
Post by Justin Case on Jun 18, 2013 14:57:41 GMT -5
Trinity of Terror?
|
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones on Jun 18, 2013 18:50:02 GMT -5
I like that Justin
Why can't a trio finisher or tag team finisher be higher than a +6? You would think they would cause more damage than a single finisher.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Case on Jun 18, 2013 19:49:21 GMT -5
I like that Justin Why can't a trio finisher or tag team finisher be higher than a +6? You would think they would cause more damage than a single finisher. Why can't it be like a roll finisher where it has different levels of potency? ie: Roll 1d6: 1-2: (+4), 3-4: (+5), 5-6: (+6)? Are you suggesting that a roll be like (+7)? Or higher? It's never been done officially, and the probability that anyone would even kick out of a high end finisher like that lends the question to a player, "Why even attempt a roll for a kick out?" Sort of takes the fun out of trying it, ya know? Sure, there's a minimal chance that someone would kick out of it, but most would be turned off by it and just end the match. I'm not trying to discourage you in wanting to do a huge finisher to make that statement that when they hit their trio finisher, you can bank on the match being over!? It's really how you envision your characters role in the promotion. Will this trios finisher actually make them bigger in their roles than they should be? Bigger than the role of say Aethran Overmaster's? That could be dangerous. But if that's your goal for them, go for it!? Just something to ponder. I do like the idea of the trio finisher. shows innovation!  |
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones on Jun 18, 2013 20:55:22 GMT -5
Well, here is what I was going with them as a trio. They are stronger in hardcore type matches and as a trio than separately. After I got the idea to have these cards made, I realize I was kinda doing a Dreadnok version of the Shield. So, I'm trying to get their cards just right. Aethran Overmaster is bring them in to help against the battle with Black Death, as he only trusts other Aethrans.
Since your more into the wrestling indie promotions than I am how would you build their finishers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Case on Jun 18, 2013 21:52:32 GMT -5
Well, here is what I was going with them as a trio. They are stronger in hardcore type matches and as a trio than separately. After I got the idea to have these cards made, I realize I was kinda doing a Dreadnok version of the Shield. So, I'm trying to get their cards just right. Aethran Overmaster is bring them in to help against the battle with Black Death, as he only trusts other Aethrans. Since your more into the wrestling indie promotions than I am how would you build their finishers? There have been instances where promoters have built a team with their tag team strengths listed first, and having * by (tag) moves stating that the potency of the holds be dropped a level. ie: move - 3 (tag) becomes move - 2 in singles. Add 1 moves get dropped. Tag finishers get lowered by one from say (+3) tag to a (+2) or even (+1) in singles matches? Sometimes a (0) finisher would drop to a Level 3 Offense move or Add 1 move in singles. You could do stuff like that even with a trios type set up with three finishers. Does that make sense? |
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones on Jun 18, 2013 22:44:03 GMT -5
I think I have that in my head and it makes sense to me. I'll try it out tomorrow and let you know, if I struggle with it any more. Thanks man for the help!
How does Fearnoks sound?
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Case on Jun 19, 2013 8:16:26 GMT -5
I think I have that in my head and it makes sense to me. I'll try it out tomorrow and let you know, if I struggle with it any more. Thanks man for the help! How does Fearnoks sound? Fearnoks for the name of the trio? Sure. It does sound more like a sub-race of Aethra or a tribal name. |
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones on Jun 19, 2013 8:33:39 GMT -5
Riot Level 1 Offense 1 clubbing forearm - 1 2 uppercut to jaw - 1 3 full nelson - 2 (pw) 4 tilt-around slam - 2 5 running spear - 2 (ag) 6 flying clothesline - 3 Level 2 Offense 1 flying frankensteiner - 2 (ag) 2 into the turnbuckle 3 snap DDT - 2 4 diving choke slam - 3 5 Aethran Power Bomb - 3 6 Riot Assault - 3 add 1 Level 3 Offense 1 out of ring ( c ) 2 piledriver on announce table - 3 3 Aethran Coup Cannon - 3 4 SABOTAGE (+2) 5 WARBRINGER (+4) *(tag) 6 IMPENDING DOOM (+5) **(trios) What do you think? Any suggestions would he helpful from here. Werner sent me the coloring of these guys and I'm wanting to get them in my fed asap and play them now.  |
|
|
|
Post by Justin Case on Jun 19, 2013 12:11:13 GMT -5
Riot Level 1 Offense 1 clubbing forearm - 1 2 uppercut to jaw - 1 3 full nelson - 2 (pw) 4 tilt-around slam - 2 5 running spear - 2 (ag) 6 flying clothesline - 3 Level 2 Offense 1 flying frankensteiner - 2 (ag) 2 into the turnbuckle 3 snap DDT - 2 4 diving choke slam - 3 5 Aethran Power Bomb - 3 6 Riot Assault - 3 add 1 Level 3 Offense 1 out of ring ( c ) 2 piledriver on announce table - 3 3 Aethran Coup Cannon - 3 4 SABOTAGE (+2) 5 WARBRINGER (+4) *(tag) 6 IMPENDING DOOM (+5) **(trios) What do you think? Any suggestions would he helpful from here. Werner sent me the coloring of these guys and I'm wanting to get them in my fed asap and play them now. so what will the finishers be with the *? And do you use the (ch X) in your play? you could use a (ch A) either on L1O or L2O? Also a (ch G or ch H) on L3O. Otherwise, very solid! Like the coloring job too, really makes them stand out! |
|
|
|
Post by Crossbones on Jun 19, 2013 12:26:47 GMT -5
The * was just to mean that it was a tag finisher and ** was a trio finisher in the planning stage. I normally don't use the (ch X) on moves, but I will if you think it adds more depth? Yea, Werner does a really awesome job on these.
|
|
