Is anyone else annoyed by this?

[TakerNGN74]

TNA Has been in existance since 2002 and although I was a fan of their early stuff (I used to watch every week on pay per view because I wanted something other than WWE to watch) and I still like some of the stuff that they do, I HATE the way they treat mainly the World Title but all of their other titles as well.

They have no long term thinking when it comes to their titles, granted WWE has had short term title reigns (the WWE title changed hands 8 times in 78 days in 2011) but they have had longer reigns with their World Title(s). TNA's longest World Title reign is 8 monthes and for a company to be over 11 years old and to not at least have one World Champion hold the belt for a solid year really annoys me.

To me it's like they will put the title on someone when he is hot (which I understand because who wouldn't) but then someone else gets hot so they have to put the title on the next guy and then the next guy and so on and so forth. TNA's World Title history and their title histories in general look like a joke, I understand that titles in wrestling are just props but it just annoys me to no end that they can't stick with one guy as their world champion for at least one year.

Feel free to agree or disagree as you please but it's just something that I had to get off my chest. Rant Over.

[tystates]

That's the way wrestling is these days. Long title reigns are a thing of the past.

[stevieray70]

I like the fact that the title can change hands quickly. It adds more suspense to the match. Long title reigns kind of kill the appeal because if its just a month or two into a title reign, you know the title is not going to change hands no matter what.

[executioner]

Long reigns are a thing of the past I am afraid. I always preferred longer reigns as it builds the champ up to be something other than a current holder of a traveling trophy. When a long reigning champ is beat, to me its a HUGE deal. 30 and 60 day reigns are not a big deal, just another month with a new champ.

[TTX]

It's a fine line in my opinion...on the one hand, a long reign builds up a champ, on the other hand, too long and people lose interest in the guy because of course he's going to win.

Personally though, a couple good 6-12 month reigns would be helpful. And not of belts that TNA (or WWE) don't really give a care about anyways.