|
Post by jimsteel on Nov 28, 2013 1:43:08 GMT -5
Looks like their leading up to unifying the titles but is it a goo idea?
I say no. They have enough issues now having good storylines but with two titles you can do more. eliminating one I think will give a lot of people less TV time and released with the same boring storyline every week on both shows and with 5 hours of shows you need more good storylines and good action not the same stuff week after week
|
|
|
Post by DK II on Nov 28, 2013 1:57:59 GMT -5
Not only do I think yes, but they should have done it years ago. One World Title/WWE Title holder who moves between shows to defend. Each show has a secondary title, defended only on that show. That is all the titles they should have. Way more prestige to holding an of the titles that way and story lines can be built around any scenario. Don't need a belt to get TV time. Time to make titles really mean something...I am all for unifying!
|
|
|
Post by Texas Kid on Nov 28, 2013 23:44:20 GMT -5
Good idea bet it won't happen though outside interference or maybe a dq
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Dec 3, 2013 0:54:53 GMT -5
Yes . There are NO longer a Raw and Smackdown . Both are on Raw or/and Smackdown . They are creating no one new with two belts . Not even different challengers ? . Its getting boring so making it one . But Orton v Cena again , please ! Boooorrrrrriiiiiiiinnnnngggggggggg
|
|