|
Post by Sickman on Oct 12, 2008 19:22:12 GMT -5
Why not a set every year? Money is money and if the fans want it and if it can be done then make it happen. Where is the issue in that? LOTF came out in the summer; correct? Then why is everyone up in arms about having to wait until next summer for another release? Oh; wait a minute......LOTF wasn't a real Legends set? I've read something like that on these boards.
|
|
|
Post by tystates on Oct 12, 2008 19:30:50 GMT -5
That's my opinion, the LOTF set I don't consider a regular edition. Or more specifically, if one set is released a year I don't want it to be LOTF. Just what I think.
|
|
|
Post by Sickman on Oct 12, 2008 20:36:04 GMT -5
And obviously everyone is entitled to that.
I'm not trying to start anything. Just wanted to vent a little. Have had a crappy month....call this my pms-isode
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncross on Oct 12, 2008 22:11:18 GMT -5
I think both the LOW and LotF can have a spot a year, have them released at different times...
|
|
|
Post by roninnoir on Oct 13, 2008 0:08:08 GMT -5
Why not a set every year? Money is money and if the fans want it and if it can be done then make it happen. Where is the issue in that? LOTF came out in the summer; correct? Then why is everyone up in arms about having to wait until next summer for another release? Oh; wait a minute......LOTF wasn't a real Legends set? I've read something like that on these boards. I don't have a problem with LOTF being a Legends set, other than - from what I hear - they are largely a set of midcarders, comparative to the LOW guys...kinda sucks when you don't have a real breakout guy somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by canadianpittbull on Oct 13, 2008 7:27:33 GMT -5
I personally find LOTF to be just as important as LOW.
|
|
|
Post by The Creek Rises on Oct 13, 2008 10:06:12 GMT -5
Looks like this (the relative worth of LOTF as compared with LOW) will be one of those subjects in which the LOW community will have to agree to disagree. I'm not as excited (by a considerable margin) by LOTF sets as I generally am with LOW sets, but I will be incorporating LOTF into my fed eventually.
|
|
|
Post by Sickman on Oct 13, 2008 13:16:35 GMT -5
LOTF came out in the summer; correct? Then why is everyone up in arms about having to wait until next summer for another release? Oh; wait a minute......LOTF wasn't a real Legends set? I've read something like that on these boards. I don't have a problem with LOTF being a Legends set, other than - from what I hear - they are largely a set of midcarders, comparative to the LOW guys...kinda sucks when you don't have a real breakout guy somewhere. On any given day those dice can be wacky. Obviously LOTF are mid to low carders in the Legends pantheon. You can tell that just by comparing the cards. But they are fun to play never the less.
|
|
|
Post by bluelantern on Oct 13, 2008 16:44:16 GMT -5
I would rather have really good, relevant, top name independent wrestlers than a set full of marginal, regional names from an era a lot of fans aren't familar with. I LOVE the legends sets. I've been a fan since '83, I've studied and watched wrestling from all eras, but that's what it shakes down to. There simply is a finite number of big name wrestlers a SMALL company like Filsinger Games (company being Tom Filsinger and a handful of people helping out) is going to be able to sign. Just by the nature of the project, there HAD to be a time when the available pool started to dry up and it would take longer for new product to get released. Face it, it's a small miracle Filsinger has managed to sign some of the huge talent it has. There is a contigent of hardcore fans who will buy pretty much ANYTHING that is released (I'd consider myself among them), but 80-90 percent of the people out there (and these forums only represent a very small percentage of actual game buyers and players, without question) will not touch a set full of lesser-know territorial guys. They'd probably think twice about only one or two "stars" if they see the rest as "filler".
I fully understand the frustration, but think we need to take a rational look at the facts and logistics of the situation.
|
|
|
Post by tystates on Oct 13, 2008 20:14:58 GMT -5
I look at it as at this point in time it is going to take more work to get people signed up, not that there isn't many names left.
|
|