|
|
Post by holland227 on Oct 21, 2008 18:08:26 GMT -5
Good call Crimson. The Newsletter is by the fans. While it will have game information, it is all from a fans standpoint and view, where the promoter is from the business itself as well as the fans. I for one will be making the Newsletter but will subscribe to the promoter at issue 100
|
|
|
|
Post by holland227 on Oct 21, 2008 18:10:05 GMT -5
What I need from people is anything off that list. If you have an article you want to write and have it in send it! Send me your top 10 singles and top 5 or 10tags I don't use straight LOW and LOTF...I use bootlegs as well. It seems that this would be straight LOW and LOTF Yes there could be both actually. A top ten official and a top ten un-official! |
|
|
|
Post by holland227 on Oct 21, 2008 21:26:00 GMT -5
So keep you guys in touch, I have gotten a banner started in it and have the first article written.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Oct 21, 2008 22:03:56 GMT -5
I think a fan newsletter sounds like a great idea for LOW. Although that won't mean that the Online Promoter won't touch on Legends as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by holland227 on Oct 22, 2008 0:55:26 GMT -5
Oh we know that. I am actually looking forward to the online promoter, but I think a fan made one is cool too. Allows more people to get things printed without putting too much pressure on the actual HQ staff!
|
|
|
|
Post by tystates on Oct 22, 2008 6:21:40 GMT -5
I think a fan newsletter sounds like a great idea for LOW. Although that won't mean that the Online Promoter won't touch on Legends as well. If there is a LOW fan newsletter, would that cause you to put less Legends in the online promoter? "Touch on Legends" says to me not very much. |
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Oct 22, 2008 8:49:44 GMT -5
I think you are trying to read too much into that Ty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Oct 22, 2008 8:55:22 GMT -5
I think the real "problem" with the Promoter concerning Legends was a lack of contributions from the fans. The more content contributed by fans to Fed HQ for the Promoter, the more coverage LOW will get in the newsletter.
Bottom line: if you want more Legends content, send in ideas to John. Also, make sure that you send your rankings in on a regular basis. Like any good publication, the Promoter responds to its readers.... but it can only respond if the publication team hears from you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2008 9:24:15 GMT -5
I think the real "problem" with the Promoter concerning Legends was a lack of contributions from the fans. The more content contributed by fans to Fed HQ for the Promoter, the more coverage LOW will get in the newsletter. Bottom line: if you want more Legends content, send in ideas to John. Also, make sure that you send your rankings in on a regular basis. Like any good publication, the Promoter responds to its readers.... but it can only respond if the publication team hears from you. Well said. Another very important thing to keep in mind for those who want to see more Legends content: With the Promoter going Online soon, there are no longer any restrictions in terms of space or printing costs. That means the only essential ingredient would be content. If content is submitted by promoters, I'm sure John K will be able to find a way to effectively include it all into the Promoter Online. ~ :-Xsk |
|
|
|
Post by jmello on Oct 22, 2008 9:28:55 GMT -5
I was told just champions for the rankings. Is that still going to remain true, once it goes online?
|
|
