|
Post by throwingtoasters on Sept 30, 2021 11:50:05 GMT -5
If it is the color starter set, I’ll buy a new copy.
|
|
|
Post by Carlzilla on Sept 30, 2021 12:52:45 GMT -5
If it is the color starter set, I’ll buy a new copy. I'm almost positive that's what it is. It's the exact same as my 2016 Snuka color starter set card, except for the card specific rule about his finisher, which is slightly tweaked as I mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Sept 30, 2021 13:13:15 GMT -5
Ya I have that card/set too. Performs well for me.
|
|
|
Post by Carlzilla on Sept 30, 2021 13:32:01 GMT -5
Ya I have that card/set too. Performs well for me. I only have this one card, are there any other non-syntax/text changes from the original 2016 set? I have the original color starter set, and got this Snuka as a "freebie" throw-in on one of my orders. I actually thought it was exactly the same for a few weeks, and then noticed the subtle difference.
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Sept 30, 2021 17:36:11 GMT -5
Ya I have that card/set too. Performs well for me. I only have this one card, are there any other non-syntax/text changes from the original 2016 set? I have the original color starter set, and got this Snuka as a "freebie" throw-in on one of my orders. I actually thought it was exactly the same for a few weeks, and then noticed the subtle difference. Good question for the LOW team Chad Olson. Quite possible. I just remember Snuka because there was some chatter at Fed HQ a ways back about his finisher mechanic. Would not be surprised if other tweaks were made as the LOW team are perfectionists.
|
|
|
Post by joebreakdown on Oct 1, 2021 5:55:50 GMT -5
Thats an interesting revision and now I want that card (!)
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Oct 1, 2021 22:48:08 GMT -5
Does this set reprint also have the Buddy Rogers moveset changes that they talked about on Uncharted Territory? Or is that still to come?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2021 8:36:15 GMT -5
How rare is the B/W JIMMY SNUKA 2009 GENCON EXCLUSIVE? Was this card ever made available outside of said Gencon? The card is basic rules, no (c) or (ch).
|
|
|
Post by throwingtoasters on Jul 27, 2022 0:56:53 GMT -5
Not sure this is the right place to post this but since it concerns future printings I thought I would post it here.
Tonight I had a match pitting The New Age Outlaws vs The Fabulous Ones. I rolled it out online and there was some confusion because all four of the cards had Bold instructions for singles/tag team matches but they were opposite.
The New Age Outlaws have bold instructions to use in tag matches while The Fabulous Ones have bold instructions for singles matches.
I’m sure if I was rolling this out with cards and dice as opposed to online, it wouldn’t have been as confusing but I had to keep reminding myself which bold stats was which because both come up in the online roller.
Anyway, I’m wondering if this could be standardized on cards going forward? I get why they were done this way for these two teams but I’m just wondering if it could be streamlined. Bold stats are alway tag stats. Or always singles stats. I know junior heavyweight stats are bold too, so maybe this is all impossible. Just bringing it up for discussion.
|
|
|
Post by TDalton on Jul 27, 2022 8:19:59 GMT -5
Not sure this is the right place to post this but since it concerns future printings I thought I would post it here. Tonight I had a match pitting The New Age Outlaws vs The Fabulous Ones. I rolled it out online and there was some confusion because all four of the cards had Bold instructions for singles/tag team matches but they were opposite. The New Age Outlaws have bold instructions to use in tag matches while The Fabulous Ones have bold instructions for singles matches. I’m sure if I was rolling this out with cards and dice as opposed to online, it wouldn’t have been as confusing but I had to keep reminding myself which bold stats was which because both come up in the online roller. Anyway, I’m wondering if this could be standardized on cards forward? I get why they were done this way for these two teams but I’m just wondering if it could be streamlined. Bold stats are alway tag stats. Or always singles stats. I know junior heavyweight stats are bold too, so may\be this is all impossible. Just bringing it up for discussion. I had brought this up to the crew a while back. There was some thought that the standard stats should be those expected to be used the most (so bold singles modifiers for mostly tag guys, and vice versa). My feeling was that you don't know how everyone is going to use the cards. My thought was for heavyweight singles stats as the standard and bold modifiers for other situations. Not sure this will be used done in the future, but glad you pointed it out.
|
|