Post by DK II on Jan 13, 2017 13:41:48 GMT -5
Well, I am going to go on record and say that I think this is a really bad move...
Feel kinda bad for my Southern California brethren in San Diego.
While the Chargers were in LA 50 years ago, they moved to San Diego because they couldn't get support in LA back then...what makes the NFL think they will get support now? They are going to be playing in a soccer stadium until the LA Football stadium is built in two years AND they are going to be PAYING rent to play in the new stadium...WHAT?!?!?
San Diego fans are not likely going to be travelling to LA to watch the team...LA fans didn't come out to Rams games once they realized the team was bad...and the Chargers while better, were not by much. If you don't win in LA (other than the Dodgers and Lakers) the fans want come out; too many other things to do there.
The most popular team NFL in LA is the Raiders...and if they move to Las Vegas, those fans will travel to Vegas to watch them...they already do go to both Oakland and San Diego to see them. And now with the Chargers getting the LA TV Market as the "local AFC home" team over the Raiders (who were considered the local AFC team), more Raiders fans will travel to see them.
Is the NFL playing the "long game" in which they think they will get 2 teams in LA, one in Vegas and then expand back to Oakland and San Diego; thereby saturating So Cal with so much NFL that it will "make more than everyone happy"?
I just can't see how this is a good move...never fear, the NFL is not about the fans, only the owners...so really should not be surprised that this move happened to appease an owner who thinks he is going to make more money in LA.
Feel kinda bad for my Southern California brethren in San Diego.
While the Chargers were in LA 50 years ago, they moved to San Diego because they couldn't get support in LA back then...what makes the NFL think they will get support now? They are going to be playing in a soccer stadium until the LA Football stadium is built in two years AND they are going to be PAYING rent to play in the new stadium...WHAT?!?!?
San Diego fans are not likely going to be travelling to LA to watch the team...LA fans didn't come out to Rams games once they realized the team was bad...and the Chargers while better, were not by much. If you don't win in LA (other than the Dodgers and Lakers) the fans want come out; too many other things to do there.
The most popular team NFL in LA is the Raiders...and if they move to Las Vegas, those fans will travel to Vegas to watch them...they already do go to both Oakland and San Diego to see them. And now with the Chargers getting the LA TV Market as the "local AFC home" team over the Raiders (who were considered the local AFC team), more Raiders fans will travel to see them.
Is the NFL playing the "long game" in which they think they will get 2 teams in LA, one in Vegas and then expand back to Oakland and San Diego; thereby saturating So Cal with so much NFL that it will "make more than everyone happy"?
I just can't see how this is a good move...never fear, the NFL is not about the fans, only the owners...so really should not be surprised that this move happened to appease an owner who thinks he is going to make more money in LA.