|
|
Post by TTX on Nov 14, 2017 21:04:20 GMT -5
I remember when i statted Vin Gerard and as I told TM later.....I could have really made every move attempt STF except for his charts and finisher.
|
|
|
|
Post by WTIC on Nov 15, 2017 17:06:00 GMT -5
LOL, Troy!
Beefy: Yes, an expanded card may very well have a Finisher on Level 2 Offense, now THAT would be different!
Although, I do know those that don't like Official cards that have a "move--3" on Level 1 Offense, it's their opinion that this makes cards too powerful right out of the gate.
As for wrestlers that have a limited moveset, I'd mix up the descriptions. Example: For someone that throws a lot of punches, you could always fill in the moves with -- punch to face, rapid-fire punches, fist to foe's chest, wild haymaker, roundhouse rights, etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by markyhitch on Nov 15, 2017 17:37:50 GMT -5
Try creating an Ultimate Warrior card without using "off the ropes".
Hey, you could call it the Ultimate Challenge!
|
|
|
|
Post by WTIC on Nov 16, 2017 22:30:48 GMT -5
That would prove to be troublesome, LOL!
Good thing I didn't try to fill out a playing card for a THREE-dice roll! That's a roll of "3 to 18", whew! FIFTEEN moves on each of 3 levels would be near impossible for most guys if you didn't do repeat moves, especially these days!
|
|
|
|
Post by DK II on Nov 16, 2017 23:23:57 GMT -5
I always thought it would have been cool to have the moves expanded to use a 1d10 or 2d6 for the moveset.
I too thought matches could take forever with the 2d6, but when you explained moves at #7 and the probability of throwing "7" with 2d6 I can see how it would keep them similar. The drawback would then be the "2" and "12" rolls...the results of throwing them would have to be something special...and that could complicate match play depending on the game mechanics.
Pretty cool
|
|
|
|
Post by DMKII: 'The Revenge' on Jan 5, 2018 17:40:35 GMT -5
I think this is really cool. Right now in my head I'm trying to formulate a way to use this somehow.
|
|
