Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2019 19:37:18 GMT -5
Sorry to post this again, but Swann is debuting in my modern indie fed soon and I need an answer.
On a roll of “1” on Level 2 Offense, Rich Swann’s card reads “dazed-1 (tag).” Obviously, this is an error. Can anyone with a physical copy of the card tell me what it’s supposed to be?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by j on Oct 8, 2019 20:38:16 GMT -5
Superkick - 2
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2019 20:48:56 GMT -5
Oops, my bad. I meant on Level 2 DEFENSE. |
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Oct 8, 2019 21:37:05 GMT -5
on the physical card, it is also dazed-1 (tag) on Level 2 Defense. So I think it was meant to be either hurt-2 (tag) or dazed-1.
I did not write the stats for Rich Swann's card, but my guess is that it should have been hurt-2 (tag) since there is another dazed-1 on Swann's Level 2 Defense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2019 6:30:09 GMT -5
Thanks, Vegas. That helps a lot.
I was almost wondering if it was just a “hurt - 2” since (tag) options generally decrease in number as you move down in defense, and he has two (tag) options on L1D and zero on L3D.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Oct 9, 2019 7:33:37 GMT -5
Thanks, Vegas. That helps a lot. I was almost wondering if it was just a “hurt - 2” since (tag) options generally decrease in number as you move down in defense, and he has two (tag) options on L1D and zero on L3D. yeah, they generally do, I didn't look at his Level 3 Defense at first when I looked at his card to answer your question about his Level 2 Defense and the card was released at a time (early 2014) when Swann was teaming outside of EVOLVE alot with Ricochet (Inner City machine Guns) so my first thought was more defensive tags for him. perhaps it is meant to be a dazed-1 without the tag (unusual to have 2 dazed-1s on Level 2 Defense, but I have seen it before.) Again, not sure what it should be listed as, I did not write the stats for the Swann card. |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Oct 9, 2019 9:05:35 GMT -5
This came up shortly after the release of the set somewhere else on the board (probably the Evolve section) and I believe it was quickly settled that it was supposed be a hurt - 2 (tag).
Hope that helps.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2019 10:34:06 GMT -5
Thanks for your help, guys!
It's funny--I was just getting ready to roll his first tag team match (he teams with ACH) against the Hart Foundation, and Teddy Hart also has two defensive tags on L1D and L2D, and none on L3D. So that's definitely a thing!
Again, thanks to everyone for your help. Much appreciated!
|
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Oct 9, 2019 11:26:48 GMT -5
honestly, that's a fairly common thing. Guys who aren't tag experts rarely have level 3 defensive tags.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Oct 9, 2019 12:22:17 GMT -5
Thanks for your help, guys! It's funny--I was just getting ready to roll his first tag team match (he teams with ACH) against the Hart Foundation, and Teddy Hart also has two defensive tags on L1D and L2D, and none on L3D. So that's definitely a thing! Again, thanks to everyone for your help. Much appreciated! yeah, I wrote Teddy Hart's card so I have personally definitely written those defensive tags that way. I was not sure how often others did though based on an editing discussion we recently had regarding one of my rough drafts in the most recent Best of set. In regards to Swann, I agree with the 4 defensive tags as written on his card. |
|
