Steef
Fighting Titan
Posts: 428
|
Post by Steef on Jul 21, 2009 22:55:08 GMT -5
Onto a new request. I was thinking it would be nice if there was a "records" page. I don't mean win-loss records, but maybe something that shows how many times someone held each title, how many title defenses they had, how long they held them. I know you can look it up in the title history part, but it would simplify things if the tracker did the math for us without us having to go back and count the number of matches, etc. Something like:
Universal:
Thantos 5x Star Warrior 3x Reptillo 1x etc.
Longest reign:
Spike 2 years (25 cards) Thunder 1 year 2 months (20 cards) Pulsar 2 weeks (1 card) Crush Never (0 cards)
|
|
|
Post by squire on Jul 22, 2009 20:04:21 GMT -5
Ahhh, Like a wrestler scorecard. That should be doable at some point.
|
|
|
Post by squire on Jul 22, 2009 20:09:04 GMT -5
In Play by Play Simulator the CAC characters would be in alphebetical order so they are easier to find CAC's should be sorted by display name.
|
|
|
Post by jmello on Jul 26, 2009 23:38:30 GMT -5
Is there any reason why 5 of my tag teams have been tied in points for a majority of 2123? There is no way all of these teams never change point total, it really makes my tag ranks boring.
Also, the Women's Title shows up twice on my rankings, once on singles and once on tag.
Lastly, could we seperate singles and tag wrestlers by the "offical" teams. I sometimes have a special match where a tag guy will wrestle singles or vice versa and I don't want them in my rankings.
|
|
|
Post by toasterboy on Jul 31, 2009 19:31:05 GMT -5
Can we get a description on how the new ranking personalities (Iron Hand/Carter) determine their rankings added to the help files? THANKS!
|
|
|
Post by shaka808 on Aug 2, 2009 16:17:51 GMT -5
Sim request for the direct sim link from card manager. Either 1. pull up the rules editor first for the match (IE: if you wanna add fatigue tokens, champions advantage, feud table roll, etc) or 2. Have a place where we can set default sim settings that will apply to all sim matches run from the sim match tab in the card manager. Also if its possible just do away with the feud if doubles setting and have all matches that are run in sim if end in doubles include the feud result on the bottom anyway. Could preface with "IF Match was a feud match the match ended in doubles" then show the results. Doesnt seem like it would effect much
|
|
Hawk
Infinity Challenge
Posts: 103
|
Post by Hawk on Aug 2, 2009 19:49:11 GMT -5
I was just about to suggest that. When you choose to sim a match, you can adjust the parameters involved. Fatigue and other issues. However, when you sim matches from the card editor (as I do to save time and clicks), you cannot adjust the fatigue counts and the other parameters.
Generally not a big deal, but if you are doing a one night tournament, and want the pin tokens to carry over, then it's not as handy. When I did my initial tournaments, I left it as is without fatigue factored in, but for bigger tournament's I'd definitely want those factored in. So I'd have to take each match and go into the simulate match field, add the stuff in, then come back and manually enter the information in the card's results.
If I'm not mistaken, if you want to do a specialty match, you have to follow that same procedure. Combining it into the card editor would save down on clicks and simplify things. Plus, makes good use of that "record result" button at the end of a sim after all.
|
|
|
Post by squire on Aug 3, 2009 16:53:24 GMT -5
Sim request for the direct sim link from card manager. Either 1. pull up the rules editor first for the match (IE: if you wanna add fatigue tokens, champions advantage, feud table roll, etc) or 2. Have a place where we can set default sim settings that will apply to all sim matches run from the sim match tab in the card manager. Also if its possible just do away with the feud if doubles setting and have all matches that are run in sim if end in doubles include the feud result on the bottom anyway. Could preface with "IF Match was a feud match the match ended in doubles" then show the results. Doesnt seem like it would effect much the first option is something I have been working towards so expect this sometime in the future. I don't have an ETA at the moment but wanted to let those who have asked for this it is on the radar rather high for me.
|
|
|
Post by shaka808 on Aug 4, 2009 15:59:10 GMT -5
Would be nice in the card creator if the arena listing was a drop down box with a list of all the arenas as well as being able to input your own.
I know it would save quite a bit of time for me to not have to hunt through webpages/gwf files and then input the arena myself.
|
|
Hawk
Infinity Challenge
Posts: 103
|
Post by Hawk on Aug 4, 2009 20:40:49 GMT -5
Here's an idea I had.
When I played the Original Set up to 2102, I would often kind of divide my roster. I'd keep guys like Chaos away from the Interplanetary championship with the rationale that if they ever won it, lowercard guys would never have a chance. In that way, I kind of had two rankings. One for the Galaxian, one for the Interplanetary.
As it is right now with COTG Online, the singles rankings are just a big top ten. But what if we could determine who is ranked? A submenu within the ranking menu that allows us through drag and drop like the card editor to define who is ranked.
Let's say I want three rankings for singles. I could have my promotion rankings, which would be exactly like it is now. Then I could define the "Galaxian" sub-list. Or who is in the "Galaxian" division. In this list I put Bloodline, Encubus, Endgame, Disaster, and so on. I then define the "Interplanetary" sub list, or who is eligible in the Interplanetary division. In this sublist I put Anivar, Swarm, Epoch, and so on. I could also define some people as being in both at the same time, guys on the cusp. Say...Valour for example.
From there, with a little drop down on the rankings screen, I can look at rankings for my entire promotion, only the guys in the Galaxian sublist, or only the guys in the IP sublist. This would allow me to get original "overall" top ten, but also better allow me to establish the rankings within each division.
|
|