|
|
Post by FCB72 on Feb 23, 2022 14:40:57 GMT -5
I am looking forward to Edge vs Styles.The long term story-telling of Brock vs Reigns has been solid.Bianca Belair vs Big Time Becks will be good.Not an overly impressive Wrestlemania lineup unless they have some big tricks and surprises up their sleeves.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimsteel on Feb 26, 2022 10:48:15 GMT -5
Vince McMahon vs Pat Macafee now rumored for WrestleMania. And Vince is a guest on his show so now possible
|
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Feb 26, 2022 10:55:56 GMT -5
That will put butts in the seats for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimsteel on Feb 28, 2022 23:01:12 GMT -5
Edge(Heel) vs AJ Styles pretty much official now
Wouldn't be surprised if Balor vs Priest(Heel) for the US Title happens to
|
|
|
|
Post by Wookie7969 on Mar 1, 2022 21:01:42 GMT -5
So apparently the titles will be unified in Brock vs Reigns as advertised. However it was reported whichever brand loses will be getting a brand new title to replace it.
I think they misunderstood what unification means lol
|
|
|
|
Post by LAWraith on Mar 1, 2022 21:17:42 GMT -5
I don't think they understand the concept of "WORLD" title. I dont mind say RAW having the IC title, Smackdown having the US title and NXT having the US title. Have one WORLD mens champion, one WORLD womens champion and one WORLD tag team champion and rotate them between shows. Do we really need two world champions or a universe champion or whatever they call it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Wookie7969 on Mar 1, 2022 23:26:46 GMT -5
I don't think they understand the concept of "WORLD" title. I dont mind say RAW having the IC title, Smackdown having the US title and NXT having the US title. Have one WORLD mens champion, one WORLD womens champion and one WORLD tag team champion and rotate them between shows. Do we really need two world champions or a universe champion or whatever they call it? If I remember correctly it was down to the networks each wanting their own identity hence the separate rosters and champions. I remember was it last year there was a big argument among the network because I believe it was smackdown that had the World title match on the weekly Show. I'm kinda suprised at them having brock on raw and smackdown without the raw network (sorry can never remember where it airs in america) getting a big name on their side to kinda make up for it. **completely unrelated side note. I seen a comment on twitter after AC Mack won the Iwtv title and someone commented saying its disgraceful calling it a world title when it's only defended among a few shows in North America to which 1 fan pointed out that WWE have a universal title despite it having never been defended outside of planet earth. Made me giggle |
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Mar 1, 2022 23:54:54 GMT -5
So apparently the titles will be unified in Brock vs Reigns as advertised. However it was reported whichever brand loses will be getting a brand new title to replace it. I think they misunderstood what unification means lol Yeah I agree, it really does not make any sense and I think it is just being done to appease the network (either USA or FOX) whose champion loses his title. Speaking of this main event, I am critical often of the WWE (for example see my Logan Paul comments from last week.) But one of the things I think WWE has done a good job with is the reign of Roman Reigns and I think the reign of Reigns continues with him defeating Lesnar at Wretlemania 38. |
|
|
|
Post by pikemojo on Mar 2, 2022 0:19:52 GMT -5
I don't think they understand the concept of "WORLD" title. I dont mind say RAW having the IC title, Smackdown having the US title and NXT having the US title. Have one WORLD mens champion, one WORLD womens champion and one WORLD tag team champion and rotate them between shows. Do we really need two world champions or a universe champion or whatever they call it? If I remember correctly it was down to the networks each wanting their own identity hence the separate rosters and champions. I remember was it last year there was a big argument among the network because I believe it was smackdown that had the World title match on the weekly Show. I'm kinda suprised at them having brock on raw and smackdown without the raw network (sorry can never remember where it airs in america) getting a big name on their side to kinda make up for it. **completely unrelated side note. I seen a comment on twitter after AC Mack won the Iwtv title and someone commented saying its disgraceful calling it a world title when it's only defended among a few shows in North America to which 1 fan pointed out that WWE have a universal title despite it having never been defended outside of planet earth. Made me giggle Someone should remind said person that there are multiple definitions to the word "universal." |
|
|
|
Post by Wookie7969 on Mar 2, 2022 0:25:59 GMT -5
If I remember correctly it was down to the networks each wanting their own identity hence the separate rosters and champions. I remember was it last year there was a big argument among the network because I believe it was smackdown that had the World title match on the weekly Show. I'm kinda suprised at them having brock on raw and smackdown without the raw network (sorry can never remember where it airs in america) getting a big name on their side to kinda make up for it. **completely unrelated side note. I seen a comment on twitter after AC Mack won the Iwtv title and someone commented saying its disgraceful calling it a world title when it's only defended among a few shows in North America to which 1 fan pointed out that WWE have a universal title despite it having never been defended outside of planet earth. Made me giggle Someone should remind said person that there are multiple definitions to the word "universal." That is also very true. Some of the comments and arguements on wrestling twitter are just hilarious tho |
|
