|
Post by darthcaedus on Jul 28, 2009 10:37:47 GMT -5
Hey everybody! I've been working on redoing a few things in my ratings system, and decided why ask for the opinion of a few people when I have hundreds right here!! So here are a few things I'm thinking of adding. Let me know what you think, or if you have any suggestions on what I'm adding in or something I may have missed. The ratings would be done as always then gone over again with these adjustments, except for the bold notes whick are changes to the basic system.
Level 1 Offense +.5 pts for ag or pw of -1 per (ag),(pw) +1 pt for ag or pw of -2 or -3 per (ag/pw) +1.5 pt for ag or pw of -4 or -5 per (ag/pw) -.5 pts for ag or pw of +1 per (ag/pw) -1 pt for ag or pw of +2 or +3 per(ag/pw) -1.5 pt for ag or pw of +4 or +5 per (ag/pw) +1 pts for move-3 (pw/ag) if -4 or -5 matching (ag/pw) +2 pts move-2 (chF/C) -2 pts for move-3 (chE/D)
Level 2 offense -4 pts per (ag/pw) RULE CHANGE +.5 pts for -1 ag or pw per (ag/pw) +1 pt for -2 ag or pw per (ag/pw) +1.5 pts for -3 ag or pw per (ag/pw) +4 pts for -4 or -5 ag or pw per (ag/pw) -.5 pts for +1 ag or pw per (ag/pw) -1 pt for +2 ag or pw per (ag/pw) -1.5 pt for +3 ag or pw per (ag/pw) -2 pt for +4 or +5 ag or pw per (ag/pw) +1 pt for move-2(ch F/C) -1 pt for move-3 (ch E/D)
Level 3 offense -1pt for move -2 (ch F/C) - .5 pts for move-3 (ch G/H)
Level 1 defense + .5 pts for dazed 1 NO MORE ROUNDING DOWN
Level 2 defense -4 pts for down-3 RULE CHANGE
Rahl
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2009 11:45:24 GMT -5
Very nicely done Rahl.
|
|
|
Post by Alexander Ubel on Jul 28, 2009 12:18:28 GMT -5
So will the above rules change the current (pw)/(ag) point ratings for level 1 & level 2 offense, or are they in addition to them?
|
|
|
Post by darthcaedus on Jul 28, 2009 13:31:50 GMT -5
So will the above rules change the current (pw)/(ag) point ratings for level 1 & level 2 offense, or are they in addition to them? In addition to them. Basically you would do the ratings with the normal rules, then go through with this set as well. Rahl
|
|
|
Post by Justin Case on Jul 28, 2009 16:29:43 GMT -5
sounds fair enough. I think it makes the formula stronger!? I'm ok with it.
|
|
|
Post by darthcaedus on Aug 3, 2009 11:15:40 GMT -5
Haven't got many posts on this. I'm guessing people think it looks good so I'm going to give it one more week, then start working on redoing the sets with this added in.
Rahl
|
|