87,88,89 vs. 22

[heat680]

I have continued on the theme that I used before with Thantos. I used the PbP simulator to run 100 matches between select characters from 2087, 2088, 2089 and 2122. Listed below are the winning percentages...

EDIT: In parenthese next to the percentage is the characters Rahl rating.


The Invasion Crew

Thantos 71.71% (52)
Star Warrior 90 70.90% (52)
Star Warrior 87 66.90% (48)
Galactic Punisher 63.39% (40)
Wolf 59.58% (41)
Bishop Hell 55.65% (37)
Bounty Hunter 53.00% (38)
Massif 52.68% (39)
Lord Nexus 50.06% (39)
Invincible Krakan 87 48.45% (35)
Spike 48.29% (34)

The 2122 Crew (against only Invasion wrestlers)
Monolith 77.91% (66)
Endgame 77.00% (61)
Disaster 64.73% (53)
Encubus 61.09% (48)
Havoc 60.55% (48)
Wolf 59.64% (52)
Bloodline 58.64% (44)
Sly Drury 56.36% (43)
Valour 53.27% (44)
Paralyze 52.91% (42)


Other "Notables"
Gryt 12.55%
Plethador 11.36%
Scimitar 3.45%

[wildfire]

Very interesting...

It's amazing that even with that super stacked card, Monolith still loses 1 in 5...definately a testament to the game design.

I also find it shocking Krakan did better than Spike.

[maddog1981]

According to the ratings Krakan is a 35 overall in Rahl's ratings and Spike is a 34.

[shaka808]

Mar 7, 2008 20:15:27 GMT -5 wildfire said:

Very interesting...

It's amazing that even with that super stacked card, Monolith still loses 1 in 5...definately a testament to the game design.

I also find it shocking Krakan did better than Spike.

Whats the % that his finisher fails I think that would make a huge difference, no matter how stackd if your opponent never rolls his pin and your finisher doesnt hit your not going to win