|
|
Post by Count Necros on May 11, 2008 8:15:40 GMT -5
I know this was asked at some point, but is there a description of how the COTG online ranking personalities determine their rankings, I would like to know the differences between them all so I can decide which is best to use for my feds.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beefy on May 11, 2008 11:40:15 GMT -5
I know this was asked at some point, but is there a description of how the COTG online ranking personalities determine their rankings, I would like to know the differences between them all so I can decide which is best to use for my feds. Thanks in advance Here you go... www.cotgonline.info/help/index.php?title=Ranking_Personalities:_aCeCentra Prime Media Network The CPMN provides a fairly balanced approach to rankings, combining a poll of their sportswriters and computer formulas to generate a composite ranking that is average in most respects. Aegis and Lance At-Las Aegis and Lance At-Las, both honorable, veteran wrestlers, put a great value on the reputation of a wrestler. In addition, they value performance in high-profile matches, and they don't look highly upon wrestlers who use underhanded tactics to win. General Rankor General Rankor thinks that a win is a win, no matter how you come across it. He also believes that in the battlefield that is the aCe, nothing is more important than winning the Essence championship - or rather, not losing it. Nicodemus Nicodemus sees things in very black and white terms. A win is a win, no matter how it came or how hard fought it was, a loss is a loss, and what you've done elsewhere is irrelevant. Murdok Murdok thinks very much like General Rankor, except he values the title even more, if that's possible. He also puts more emphasis on a wrestler's past record and accomplishments than anyone else in the federation does, a line of thinking that is very much in favor of his own storied career. The Producers of the Nemean Show Legends? Who needs 'em? Titles? The best wrestlers don't get shots anyway. Truss and the other young Ravagers who produce the Nemean Show want to see guys going all out in the ring, and they reward that heavily. If you're doing well in the ring, they're going to notice you. www.cotgonline.info/help/index.php?title=Ranking_Personalities:_GWFCommissioner's Office These rankings are handed down from the Commissioner's Office by Massif himself. Always acting with the health of his federation and HoloVid ratings in mind, Massif tends to put emphasis on wrestlers who perform well in title matches, and is very critical of wrestlers who lose on camera. He also believes in pushing the guys who "put butts in seats," and will show a definite preference for the established powers in the fed. Also, playing to the perceived attention spans of the average HoloVid veiwer, Massif doesn't go very far back in determining his rankings. The Cetus Committee Comprised of Omega, Star Warrior, and a few of their closest advisors, the Cetus Committee is concerned primarily with how a wrestler performs on the biggest stages: in title matches. The Cetus Committee also puts a very high value on winning honorably, virtually discounting wins by countout and entirely discounting wins by disqualification. The Cetus Committee also tends to take a long, hard look at a wrestler's history, rather than what's just happened in the last couple of months. Vidtek's Close-Up Rating's Spotlight Vidtek's thoughts on what makes a good wrestler are very similar to those of the Commissioner. However, Vidtek doesn't think too much about the perceived reputation of the wrestlers in question, presumably so that he can justify ranking himself higher. Deimos Sports Programming Network DSPN provides a fairly balanced approach to rankings, combining a poll of their sportswriters and computer formulas to generate a composite ranking that is average in most respects. |
|
|
|
Post by Count Necros on May 12, 2008 9:31:01 GMT -5
cool, thanks for this, I appreciate it
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beefy on May 14, 2008 22:19:25 GMT -5
cool, thanks for this, I appreciate it Your welcome here to help if I can. |
|
