Lord Rahl
Infinity Challenge
FG Community Citizen Award Winner
Posts: 19
|
Post by Lord Rahl on Jul 14, 2011 14:45:00 GMT -5
Claudio Castagnoli 47(49)
Mike Quackenbush 32(39)
Delirious 31(34)
Tim Donst 30(34)
Eddie Kingston 29(29)
Frightmare 27(34)
Brodie Lee 27(31)
Ultramantis Black 27(28)
Tursas 25(29)
Fire Ant 24(30){36}
Jigsaw 24(30)
Icarus 23(30)
Soldier Ant 21(35)
Chuck Taylor 21(25)
Sara Del Ray 21(24)
Daizee Haze 20(24)
Sugar Dunkerton 18(30)
Hallowicked 18(28)
Dasher Hatfield 14(27)
Green Ant 13(20){31}
Tim Donst LE 13(17)
Pinkie Sanchez 13(16)
Ares 11(24){36}
Johnny Gargano 10(23)[25]
Archibald Peck 3(4)
Look for COUNCIL OF WAR & the 25th Anny cards ratings to be up soon!
Rahl
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Jul 14, 2011 15:31:24 GMT -5
Castagnoli really went from a 21 to a 47 on his new card?
I didn't think his card was that much more enhanced.
His agility only went from 0 to -1, his power went from -1 to -2 (and -2 I consider more accurate for Castagnoli today.)
Finisher rating remains the exact same, his charts only went up very slightly (from 3Bs and 1 A to 2Bs and 2As,) he only has 1 extra level r move throughout his offense, and although his defense now has the Swiss death possibility (but only on a roll of 6) he now also has a down 3 on his L2D unlike with his LOTF card.
I know I am not very good at math, but how does the Rahl rating for Caludio Castagnoli's new card more than double with those stats?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Jul 14, 2011 15:34:51 GMT -5
Also, how does Claudio Castagnoli's Rahl tag rating go from a 28 to a 49 when his defensive tag options are only half as many as on his LOTF card?
Overall I am a big fan of Lord Rahl's rating system. But something looks wrong here for Castagnoli's new Rahl rating.
|
|
Lord Rahl
Infinity Challenge
FG Community Citizen Award Winner
Posts: 19
|
Post by Lord Rahl on Jul 14, 2011 15:42:13 GMT -5
I rated this card at a 37 before adding 10 pts for his 2 Swiss Death reversals, but as to the original LOTF card's ratings I did not do those. I never got those sets and don't remember who actually rated them. His tag rating is only so high from his singles skill...
Rahl
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jul 14, 2011 15:43:28 GMT -5
No doubt his duel Swiss Death mechanics are playing a part in that high rating. I didn't see any Rahl rule for anything like that. Psi looks inflated for the same reason. I'd say, if you are judging a card by it's Rahl Rating, he's about a 37.
The important part is he is the top guy in the set and that's where he was supposed to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Jul 14, 2011 15:47:17 GMT -5
I rated this card at a 37 before adding 10 pts for his 2 Swiss Death reversals, but as to the original LOTF card's ratings I did not do those. I never got those sets and don't remember who actually rated them. His tag rating is only so high from his singles skill... Rahl OK, so you weren't the one who actually gave the Castagnoli card from the first LOTF set the Rahl ratings of 21 (28.) I guess that makes more sense now. The 21 (28) Rahl ratings for Castagnoli's first card I was referring to are listed on this board at the following link: filsingergames.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=lof&thread=3035&page=1#45159I knew something looked wrong when trying to compare Castagnoli's new card Rahl rating with Castagnoli's original Rahl card rating that is listed on this board. |
|
Lord Rahl
Infinity Challenge
FG Community Citizen Award Winner
Posts: 19
|
Post by Lord Rahl on Jul 14, 2011 15:52:50 GMT -5
No doubt his duel Swiss Death mechanics are playing a part in that high rating. I didn't see any Rahl rule for anything like that. Psi looks inflated for the same reason. I'd say, if you are judging a card by it's Rahl Rating, he's about a 37. Yeah Psi got a 15 point boost from his with the finisher chance.. |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jul 14, 2011 15:59:45 GMT -5
No doubt his duel Swiss Death mechanics are playing a part in that high rating. I didn't see any Rahl rule for anything like that. Psi looks inflated for the same reason. I'd say, if you are judging a card by it's Rahl Rating, he's about a 37. Yeah Psi got a 15 point boost from his with the finisher chance.. Wow. Guess Tom wasn't over-hyping it. I think it's a nice evolution from Mantis' Prey Snare. After all these years Tom is still finding new and innovative ways to stat the cards. Strong. |
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Jul 14, 2011 17:27:45 GMT -5
Great turn around time LR!
|
|
|
|
Post by Shon Maxx on Jul 14, 2011 17:51:30 GMT -5
I just got the set this afternoon. Yeah, Claudio's a monster, with Donst and Frightmare (The two I was looking forward to the most) not far behind. Great set overall and great work by the team!
|
|
