|
|
Post by Sickman on Jul 5, 2008 18:33:07 GMT -5
If you could get one to sign but it was under the condition that you COULD NOT sign the other, who do you choose?
I'd go Savage because I could have more fun with him then Hogan. Not a huge fan of Mr. Bollea.
|
|
|
|
Post by toasterboy on Jul 5, 2008 18:37:41 GMT -5
Macho Man in thehopes someday we'll have Honky Tonk Man and could have the two go head to head for the IC belt!
|
|
|
|
Post by loneriders1 on Jul 5, 2008 18:46:16 GMT -5
Macho Man of course.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cory Olson on Jul 5, 2008 21:51:55 GMT -5
I'd go with Macho. Based on their pushes in real life wrestling, a Hogan card would be one of the toughest ones we'd ever make. I'd prefer Savage, as his card would be tough, but not a "killer".
|
|
|
|
Post by lwffantrav on Jul 5, 2008 22:29:24 GMT -5
Savage because he was always a guy who busted his butt in the ring and tried to give something back. Hogan was one guy who has taken from the business far more than he has given back
|
|
kokushi
Infinity Challenge
Thanks for coming out...next!!!
Posts: 190
|
Post by kokushi on Jul 5, 2008 23:02:17 GMT -5
I thing Savage because he would just be more fun to use and the fact we don't have a card that couls really compete with Hogan's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Jul 6, 2008 8:47:29 GMT -5
Savage because he was always a guy who busted his butt in the ring and tried to give something back. Hogan was one guy who has taken from the business far more than he has given back See, I would disagree with you on this one. There are very few guys who have given more to the business than Hogan. In all likelihood, wrestling wouldn't be a major television product today without him. There probably wouldn't be lucrative payouts on the scale that we are seeing. People might dislike the in-ring style and performance of Hogan, or his backstage politicking. People always claim he never put anyone over, forgeting how he laid down for young guys (who probably didn't yet deserve it) like Paul Wight and Mike Awesome. "They" remember guys he WOULDN'T put over because he had personal problems with them- even though those same guys would have refused to do the job if the situation was reversed (and by that I mean that if they had the popularity and drawing power of Hogan). Bottom line, getting Hogan might be the single best thing ever to happen to LOW in terms of exposure. There are other considerations- like Cory said, there is no way he wouldn't be one of the most stacked cards in the history of LOW. Personally, I'd be happy with either. Until then, I'll use the WM IV versions or the ones that Cory put together. Mike |
|
|
|
Post by Cory Olson on Jul 6, 2008 9:29:17 GMT -5
People always claim he never put anyone over, forgeting how he laid down for young guys (who probably didn't yet deserve it) like Paul Wight and Mike Awesome. When did Hogan job to Mike Awesome? I'm not saying that to be rude, I just don't remember it happening. One thing to remember is that just because Hogan may have lost to someone, doesn't mean he put them over. Billy Kidman is a good example of that. Bottom line, getting Hogan might be the single best thing ever to happen to LOW in terms of exposure. Yes, that is a good point. However, realistically Hogan would probably want too much money. If someone like Mike Rotunda was too expensive, I imagine Hogan would be too. Although Savage wouldn't probably be cheap either!  As you said, Mike, we've got bootlegs of them for now. |
|
|
|
Post by tattoo on Jul 6, 2008 9:42:34 GMT -5
I have to say Hogan. I like Macho as well and it's a tough choice but to me wrestling business=Hogan. Too big to pass.
BTW red & yellow or black & white or red, white & blue, doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sickman on Jul 6, 2008 10:02:52 GMT -5
I must say that I'm surprised the voting isnt a lot closer.
|
|
