|
|
Post by jimsteel on Oct 19, 2008 10:30:47 GMT -5
I don't like it when a new wrestler comes in and doesn't have a finisher. I think everyone should have one even if a roll finisher
Example is Scimitar. His pin is a 6(3) which should be a decent wrestler but no finisher
|
|
|
|
Post by roninnoir on Oct 19, 2008 11:21:18 GMT -5
Nope.
Depends entirely on the wrestler concept.
Original Ursa Major needed no finisher. PIN Rating alone does not make a decent wrestler...in the later years, there are several mediocre guys with 4(1) PIN ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Oct 19, 2008 17:19:29 GMT -5
I don't like it when a new wrestler comes in and doesn't have a finisher. I think everyone should have one even if a roll finisher Example is Scimitar. His pin is a 6(3) which should be a decent wrestler but no finisher I like the 'no finisher' trait for select situations. Low level rookies and 'guys past their prime' would fit the mold pretty well. It's a unique card mechanic that makes for a nice change of pace. Not every wrestler has to have a 'killer move' and this drives home that some wrestlers have sharply weaker offensive arsenals than their peers. |
|
Werner Mueck
Fighting Titan
Filsinger Games Artist/FG Community Citizen Award Winner
Posts: 315
|
Post by Werner Mueck on Oct 19, 2008 17:45:37 GMT -5
It all depends on the concept of the character. Wrestlers can have strong defense and weak offense, gives each character a little personality in the ring. You beat a guy down with a low pin and he keeps getting back up but when he finally gets the offense, he chokes because he has no finisher. He still has a chance to win, just not with an instant pin attempt and a roll modifier. It may make some lopsided matches but wrestling is like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Oct 19, 2008 20:28:46 GMT -5
I like using the no-finisher character sparingly. There should never be more than one active at any time in a fed these days with the roster sizes what they are, though.
|
|
Nathan Wylde
Fighting Titan
NSWA-The Guiding Light in Bootleg Wrestling
Posts: 490
|
Post by Nathan Wylde on Oct 21, 2008 0:34:47 GMT -5
If your planning on creating a Jobber that will constantly lose to the rest of the fed, No-finisher is fine but even some of the Low end talent at least had SOME means of sealing the deal!
|
|
|
|
Post by roninnoir on Nov 2, 2008 5:32:24 GMT -5
If your planning on creating a Jobber that will constantly lose to the rest of the fed, No-finisher is fine but even some of the Low end talent at least had SOME means of sealing the deal! Well, that's what Level-3 moves are for. If the game had NO other way of finishing a match aside from a finisher, then yeah, that would be a problem...as it is, I see no problem with finisher-free guys, from time to time...or guys like Grovel, who are TECHNICALLY finisher-free, but have a few add 1 moves to make up the deficit a bit. |
|
|
|
Post by jmello on Nov 2, 2008 8:08:11 GMT -5
How many guys in WWE, can you not name their finisher? Exactly. You can be a wrestler without a notable finisher. Of course, you won't sell as many tshirts, but until you find yourself on the winning side alot, why would you have one?
|
|
