|
|
Post by Eliath on Jul 14, 2010 7:04:10 GMT -5
The A rating is the "best" rating, but on the chart there is a higher chance that the A rating will slip & fall in a Sci-Lar Stream (the worst result) than someone with a C rating (the "worst")
I believe that the chart results are backwards to what they should be.
|
|
|
|
Post by TOM on Jul 14, 2010 8:22:47 GMT -5
Thanks for pointing out but I think it's ok. The outcome is from the point of view of the fighter on defense like our regular charts in COTG. That means THE OPPONENT is more likely to slip and fall.
|
|
|
|
Post by TOM on Jul 14, 2010 9:19:19 GMT -5
Krakan's rating has nothing to do with it. In this situation Star Warrior's Cetus Battleground rating is checked on the chart as is the case in ALL situations where a defender is being attacked.
Rating A is clearly better for Star Warrior (or anybody). He comes back more often and stronger on the chart.
It's the same logic as the regular Champions of the Galaxy game. If a wrestler is thrown into the ropes the WRESTLER ON DEFENSE's ropes rating is always checked and the outcome is better on lower rolls.
|
|
|
|
Post by TOM on Jul 14, 2010 9:33:46 GMT -5
Whoops, where'd you go? My second post was to a reply that was deleted. Anyway I hope my comments are helpful to anyone else that might have a question.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by blackhand on Sept 18, 2010 7:48:16 GMT -5
I think we have to be careful not to put too much emphasis on the battleground where it over takes from the characters fighting. 4 of the same chart is pushing it. we maybe need to come up with some more charts. not just battleground. I really think a Battlefield "Wits" would be a good chart for say Kraken or Commander Sam. the experience factor should play a part on strategy. with Star warrior and Thantos lack of experience would also play a big role.
|
|
