|
Post by pikemojo on Jun 6, 2014 10:23:47 GMT -5
The group was going to break up eventually.
|
|
|
Post by EpicDave on Jun 7, 2014 12:06:06 GMT -5
I go back to the Horsemen era. Flair had plenty of title runs, Arn and Tully were an incredible tag team, and both had runs with singles titles. And they didn't have to break up the group to accomplish that.
I'm not big on the "spy" theory either. You have just kicked Evolution's ass to the point where Batista quit the company. Why would you need a spy against a dying faction that's no longer a threat? That booking wouldn't make sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by Shon Maxx on Jun 7, 2014 14:47:47 GMT -5
I figured Ambrose would turn before the other two, but maybe they want more singles matches for the trio. I just hope they give them more mic time. It'd really suck to do all this for rollins, only for him to stand in the background every week.
|
|
|
Post by lucifer on Jun 10, 2014 16:18:10 GMT -5
I for one was less than impressed with week 1 of the post-Shield Rollins...made him look like a little you-know-what when he ran for the hills after calling out Ambrose and Reigns!
|
|
|
Post by Kamala on Jun 10, 2014 16:38:14 GMT -5
WWE problems are HHH and Stephanie suck at there jobs. HHH ego is beyond belief and anyone who thinks he is doing a good job go look at the ratings. SuperCena for 10 years is so stale and old and people are sick on it. Cena never puts new talent over clean always 3 on 1 making him SuperCena every week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2014 18:19:15 GMT -5
I for one was less than impressed with week 1 of the post-Shield Rollins...made him look like a little you-know-what when he ran for the hills after calling out Ambrose and Reigns! Wouldn't you run from those two?
|
|
|
Post by lucifer on Jun 10, 2014 19:20:49 GMT -5
After his promo last night, I'm convinced Ambrose / Moxley is the kind of guy I'd buy a beer! But seriously, had Rollins stood and fought,it would have looked better for both sides, in my opinion. And would have added more heat,as well. And why the hell would you give Orton the night off right at a pivotal point in the story? That would be as ridiculous as having someone end the Undertaker's streak and then taking them off television. Oh, wait...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2014 12:08:30 GMT -5
But seriously, had Rollins stood and fought,it would have looked better for both sides, in my opinion. How? Reigns is proven to be a legit killer and Ambrose is nuts. Rollins knows that better than anyone, why the hell would he stand and fight them both? And would have added more heat,as well. No, he would have gotten his ass kicked by both of them and it would have killed his heat or he would have won against both of them and it would have killed their heat. And why the hell would you give Orton the night off right at a pivotal point in the story? Given that he's taken the night off for about the last 10 years, I tend not to notice. That would be as ridiculous as having someone end the Undertaker's streak and then taking them off television. Oh, wait... Nah, it's about as ridiculous as constantly complaining about Lesnar ending the streak when it makes perfect business sense and was needed to bring Brock back after the Punk and Triple H feuds ruined him as a draw. Personally, I'm more upset that the match was awful.
|
|
|
Post by throwingtoasters on Jun 11, 2014 12:47:03 GMT -5
He ran away because he's a spy.
|
|
|
Post by lucifer on Jun 11, 2014 12:54:56 GMT -5
But seriously, had Rollins stood and fought,it would have looked better for both sides, in my opinion. How? Reigns is proven to be a legit killer and Ambrose is nuts. Rollins knows that better than anyone, why the hell would he stand and fight them both? And would have added more heat,as well. No, he would have gotten his ass kicked by both of them and it would have killed his heat or he would have won against both of them and it would have killed their heat. And why the hell would you give Orton the night off right at a pivotal point in the story? Given that he's taken the night off for about the last 10 years, I tend not to notice. That would be as ridiculous as having someone end the Undertaker's streak and then taking them off television. Oh, wait... Nah, it's about as ridiculous as constantly complaining about Lesnar ending the streak when it makes perfect business sense and was needed to bring Brock back after the Punk and Triple H feuds ruined him as a draw. Personally, I'm more upset that the match was awful. Thank god you were able to clarify all of that for me. Don't know how I've made it this far as a wrestling fan without your insight, which is obviously, ALWAYS correct. And those of us with differing opinions be damned!!!
|
|