|
Post by marktaggart on May 22, 2009 2:45:19 GMT -5
Here are the ratings, to the best of my calculations, for Legends of the Future: Second Fall
Sara Del Rey 28 (31) Tyler Black 21 (28) Brent Albright 19 (22) Brodie Lee 19 (22) Erick Stevens 17 (21) Eddie Kingston 17 (20) Daizee Haze 17 (18) Jimmy Jacobs 16 (23)* *28 (38) when Jacobs is bleeding. Chuck Taylor 14 (18) Matt Jackson 10 (22) Ultramantis Black 8 (10) Nick Jackson 7 (18)
The inclusion of (pw) and -1 moves on level 2 offense brought down the numbers for several of these guys. Add that to the fact that everyone except Sara Del Rey has a "down-3" on level 2 defense, and you can see why the ratings are lower across the board than in the first Legends of the Future edition.
|
|
|
Post by Count Necros on May 22, 2009 10:30:07 GMT -5
hmm..I wonder if I am doing something wrong, my Rating calculations for the Second LotF set came out slightly higher than yours.
|
|
|
Post by marktaggart on May 23, 2009 0:18:52 GMT -5
Which ones? I went back through and found a few errors I made. That made Tyler Black a little better and Jimmy Jacobs when bleeding was better. But I also found two that were weaker than I calculated.
|
|
|
Post by Count Necros on May 23, 2009 11:08:41 GMT -5
well the two I had done that came out slightly higher were Sara Del Ray and Brodie Lee, like I said I may be doing it wrong so here is the breakdown of how I came to those stats. With a running total after each division
SARA DEL RAY
LEVEL 1 OFFENSE 2 points for ag move 2 points for pw move
total: 4 points
LEVEL 2 OFFENSE
2 points for # 5 move 2 points for # 6 move
total : 8 points
LEVEL 3 OFFENSE
1 point for # 1 move 1 point for # 3 move 1 point for # 4 move 1 point for # 5 move 4 points for Finisher 1 point for finisher rating
total: 17 points
CHARTS & DQ No points for this section
total: 17 points
LEVEL 1 DEFENSE
1 point for two dazed -1 (#1 & # 2 on card) 1 point for reversal - 1 2 points for reversal -2
total: 21 points
LEVEL 2 DEFENSE
2 points for reversal - 1 4 points for reversal - 2 1 points for dazed - 1 (# 5 on card)
total: 28 points
LEVEL 3 DEFENSE No points for this section
total: 28 points
AG,PW,Cage
2 points for -1 pw rating
total: 30 points
so assuming I did everything right and my math isn't faulty I have her at a 30 (33)
If you like I can post the ratings I got for this set and we can do a comparison.
|
|
|
Post by marktaggart on May 23, 2009 17:49:41 GMT -5
well the two I had done that came out slightly higher were Sara Del Ray and Brodie Lee, like I said I may be doing it wrong so here is the breakdown of how I came to those stats. With a running total after each division SARA DEL RAY LEVEL 1 OFFENSE2 points for ag move 2 points for pw move This is the discrepancy. The way it's written in the formula above is kind of tricky, but it should be +2 if there are 2 (pw) and/or (ag) moves on level 1, +4 if there is only 1, not +2 for each one if it's under 3. If you look at the original post with the ratings from Rahl, you'll see that the way I describe it is the way it's supposed to be. Essentially, it breaks down like this: 1 pw or ag move on lv.1= +4 2 ag and/or pw moves on lv.1= +2 3 pw and/or ag moves on lv.1=0 4 pw and/or ag moves on lv.1= -2
|
|
|
Post by Count Necros on May 23, 2009 20:25:15 GMT -5
Well then that makes sense I guess, since I kept coming out about 2 to 4 points above your list. Thanks for clearing that up, now I have to re-do all the bootlegs that I have. lol
|
|
|
Post by Shon Maxx on Jun 8, 2009 9:50:26 GMT -5
Hawk- LE 34(49) Sam Hayne LE 32(35) Rahl How did Sam Hayne get a 32? I went over his card 2 or 3 times, but the highest I can get his stats is a 19. Did I miss a special promotional card or is it just a typo?
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Jun 11, 2009 22:55:59 GMT -5
The 32 might have been the original Sam Hayne card that Indy Circuit Pulse did. His stats were toned down for his official card.
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Jun 11, 2009 22:57:16 GMT -5
Oh yeah, he got tweaked down quite a bit from what I've heard. He fits in much better with the LOTF with his current card.
|
|
|
Post by Shon Maxx on Jun 12, 2009 4:15:43 GMT -5
Okay, that makes sense. His 32 probably would've laid waste to my fed, but I can use him in my minor league fed instead.
Thanks.
Does that mean Savage T has to be downgraded as well?
|
|