Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
ICARUS
Jan 11, 2014 21:27:23 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2014 21:27:23 GMT -5
LEVEL 3 OFFENSE
4 Pedigree - 3
5 Wings Of Icarus (0)
Redundant or am I nit picking?
|
|
|
|
ICARUS
Jan 12, 2014 9:36:53 GMT -5
Post by peacemongrel on Jan 12, 2014 9:36:53 GMT -5
One as a regular move and the other as a Finisher?
|
|
|
|
ICARUS
Jan 12, 2014 10:26:40 GMT -5
Post by Tournament Master on Jan 12, 2014 10:26:40 GMT -5
LEVEL 3 OFFENSE 4 Pedigree - 3 5 Wings Of Icarus (0) Redundant or am I nit picking? Wings of Icarus, I thought was a submission move. |
|
|
|
ICARUS
Jan 12, 2014 14:05:19 GMT -5
Post by pikemojo on Jan 12, 2014 14:05:19 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure it's the same move...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
ICARUS
Jan 12, 2014 14:06:29 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2014 14:06:29 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure it's the same move... It is. ;-) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
ICARUS
Jan 12, 2014 14:56:23 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2014 14:56:23 GMT -5
This seems like a gigantic foul-up on the Icarus card that was never caught and corrected. Wings Of Icarus is a Pedigree type move, always has been. The submission move described in the handbook as Wings Of Icarus is BURNING WINGS.
|
|
|
|
ICARUS
Jan 12, 2014 21:26:19 GMT -5
Post by TTX on Jan 12, 2014 21:26:19 GMT -5
Finally..can call it properly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
ICARUS
Jan 13, 2014 19:56:19 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2014 19:56:19 GMT -5
LEVEL 3 OFFENSE 4 Pedigree - 3 5 Wings Of Icarus (0) Redundant or am I nit picking? Wings of Icarus, I thought was a submission move. "Wings of Icarus (Double underhook facebuster, sometimes while swinging from the corner)[1][2][4][90]" "Pedigree[2] (Double underhook facebuster) - 1995–present" |
|
