|
|
Post by Nick_Nuke on Feb 6, 2014 0:00:58 GMT -5
I am just curious as to what are the Rahl ratings? How should you use them? How is it figured out?
|
|
|
|
Post by The B-Mack on Feb 6, 2014 8:31:57 GMT -5
I am just curious as to what are the Rahl ratings? How should you use them? How is it figured out? It is basically a ratings system designed to assign a set of numerical values to a card (singles rating and tag rating), based on potency of moves, defense, pin rating, chart ratings, etc. The goal is to be able to compare any two cards and see which one is theoretically better. It is pretty accurate for the most part. I am sure I did not do this justice though, so read here for more details: filsingergames.proboards.com/thread/3016/lord-rahls-gwf-ratings |
|
|
|
Post by pikemojo on Feb 6, 2014 16:43:33 GMT -5
Yes, and it got its name from a board member going by the name Lord Rahl. I don't think too many people use it for rankings or anything but it can help decide where you might start someone. It's not perfect but it is the best thing anyone has ever come up with and, honestly, it's impossible to judge how a card is going to fare with this game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nick_Nuke on Feb 6, 2014 17:24:56 GMT -5
Thanks for the info and links. They helped a lot.
|
|
|
|
Post by E-Ternal on Feb 6, 2014 17:25:44 GMT -5
I kinda use it as a blueprint to determine seeding in tournaments and as Pike said I use it to determine where to start someone out.
|
|
|
|
Post by TTX on Feb 6, 2014 21:49:15 GMT -5
yeah, it's a good stepping stone but if you play by the standard rules with choices and such, things can get a little wonky. Also, 2nd level offense is underrated and 1st level offense is overrated
|
|
