3 Hour Raws every week

[swarm]

Here is all they need to add to RAW to make 3 hours of it worth it: 1 Cruiserweight match each week that goes 15-20 min minimum. 1 tag team match with actual tag teams that has some kind of barring on the tag team belts (either guys moving up the ladder, a tag title match itself). If they do those those two things, it will be worth it. If they fill it with twitter stuff, I won't be able to watch it.

[E-Ternal]

May 23, 2012 9:11:16 GMT -5 Swarm said:

Here is all they need to add to RAW to make 3 hours of it worth it: 1 Cruiserweight match each week that goes 15-20 min minimum. 1 tag team match with actual tag teams that has some kind of barring on the tag team belts (either guys moving up the ladder, a tag title match itself). If they do those those two things, it will be worth it. If they fill it with twitter stuff, I won't be able to watch it.

Dangit...you have expressed my thoughts again...STOP IT
The Twitter crap has gotta stop or atleast slow up.

[pikemojo]

If those 2 things happen Raw would be better having gone 3 hours. If they do all that interactive, fans vote on what match you want to see crap then it will fail and Raw will go back to 2 hours.

[jrgoldman]

Don't hold your breath. There will never be 15-20 minute matches that aren't main events on free TV. Nor should there be, frankly.

I want the first hour to be almost like a separate show, like Superstars used to be. An hour of recaps, interviews, a couple squash matches and a 5-10 minute "main event" to get us going before the main angle stuff starts at 9:00 PM.

[Deleted]

May 23, 2012 15:09:15 GMT -5 E-Ternal said:

The Twitter crap has gotta stop or atleast slow up.

You wanna go watch a RAW from seven or eight months ago and then watch last week's RAW and tell me they haven't scaled the Twitter BS back a ton?

They can mention Twitter every ten seconds for all I give a crap, I just want a consistently entertaining show instead of one RAW every few months being worth the time to watch.

[E-Ternal]

Just an extra hour that I have used lately to catch up on reading or cooking shows...WWE is gonna have to step it up QUITE a BIT to get me interested again.

[payback]

Well I thought this 3 hour Raw did nothing but reassure me that 3 hours is too much for a live wrestling TV show. We didn't see longer and more exciting matches. Didn't see any of the guys who may normally get bumped due to time constraints of a 2 hour show.

WWE really needs to stop caring about what's trending on twatter and care more about developing good storylines instead of showing us Vince dancing to Brodus Clay's music and having the same guys in multiple segments. Daniel Bryan was on the show 3 different times. As much as I like him, I don't need to see him 3 times.

I won't be tuning in at 8pm anymore. There's no point. Anything I might miss, I'll see a recap of later if it's important.

At least Ziggler gets a title shot and I did like the AJ parts of the show. Her character is interesting and I'm curious to see who she ends up siding with at the PPV. I'm hoping it's Daniel Bryan.

Can all the faces stop trying to be smart asses and cracking stupid jokes please? It's like WWE forgot how to write a babyface. So annoying.

[jrgoldman]

Really? I thought this three hour Raw was one of the best they've ever done. It had two really good matches, some pretty decent storytelling throughout, a great Big show promo (dude is on fire), and VADER.

you can't hate on a show that had Vader killing Heath Slater.

[Tournament Master]

I thought the show last night was really good. The only part that didnt hold my interest was the ending segment. Thought the show did a good job selling the PPV, and had some good comedy throughout.

[E-Ternal]

The only things that interested me were the 4-way, after Khali was gone and AJ...sad that a 90lb fairy, see Tinkerbell, is more entertaining than your primary storyline. That being said it was better than it has been for weeks. I see a small bit of hope.