|
|
Post by cruefan68 on Dec 9, 2017 18:51:23 GMT -5
I really like this, I might try using this in my fed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Dec 10, 2017 3:48:52 GMT -5
I like this idea
|
|
|
|
Post by barnestormer on Dec 11, 2017 2:09:20 GMT -5
What about working in some sort of "no-compete clause" into your chart for when a wrestler decides to leave one promotion for another, much like WWE's 90-day "no-compete" clause?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sinclair Promotions on Dec 12, 2017 6:49:36 GMT -5
Do you have a way of adjusting the length of contracts? I run my rosters based on year to year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Dec 12, 2017 8:59:30 GMT -5
Do you have a way of adjusting the length of contracts? I run my rosters based on year to year. Ya, each promoter would have to adjust based on how you run your fed. If and when I run this fed, my year will look like 20 cards. So the guys w 20 + nextr to their name are signed for a full year, some longer. |
|
|
|
Post by graymar on Dec 12, 2017 14:36:33 GMT -5
For tag teams (plus managers or not)...you could roll as a group...or individually.
If they roll as a tag team, they have to remain tag team for duration of contract.
If rolling individually, I'd give some "+" to the second member. Maybe a plus 1 or 2 on the second members roll.
Eaton signs...but Condrey doesn't...wonder where Lane is?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gunslinger on Dec 12, 2017 15:03:30 GMT -5
This might be too much record keeping but how about this: if the guy lost his last three matches before the negotiation, you add 1 to the roll. if he won his last three matches, you substract 1. My thinking is that if the guy is on a losing streak, the promotion won't be too keen on keeping him. On the other hand, if he's on a hot streak, they'll work harder to sign him.
|
|
|
|
Post by graymar on Dec 12, 2017 15:44:51 GMT -5
This might be too much record keeping but how about this: if the guy lost his last three matches before the negotiation, you add 1 to the roll. if he won his last three matches, you substract 1. My thinking is that if the guy is on a losing streak, the promotion won't be too keen on keeping him. On the other hand, if he's on a hot streak, they'll work harder to sign him. I think there certainly should be an add if one holds a belt. |
|
|
|
Post by jobber83 on Dec 13, 2017 7:06:54 GMT -5
I'll definitely be adding this to my NWA territory! Thanks for sharing!
|
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Dec 13, 2017 17:01:29 GMT -5
This might be too much record keeping but how about this: if the guy lost his last three matches before the negotiation, you add 1 to the roll. if he won his last three matches, you substract 1. My thinking is that if the guy is on a losing streak, the promotion won't be too keen on keeping him. On the other hand, if he's on a hot streak, they'll work harder to sign him. I think there certainly should be an add if one holds a belt. Agree. Something along the lines of building brand loyalty with title reigns. I really appreciate all the feedback on this. Hopefully I can find the time to get this fed and this idea running soon. |
|
