|
Post by swarm on Jul 27, 2011 5:38:13 GMT -5
I read somewhere about a "conversion chart" for this set to be used with LOW. Is this actually needed? Allen Nope. Idea got scrapped when it was decided the guys were statted just right that they fit into the whole LOW/LOTF universe as is. No conversion chart needed.
|
|
|
Post by cruefan68 on Jul 27, 2011 7:54:44 GMT -5
I read somewhere about a "conversion chart" for this set to be used with LOW. Is this actually needed? Allen Nope. Idea got scrapped when it was decided the guys were statted just right that they fit into the whole LOW/LOTF universe as is. No conversion chart needed. I haven't tried the new cards against LOW/LOTF cards yet but looking at the results others have put up it looks like they fit right in with the other cards.
|
|
allensh
Infinity Challenge
Posts: 39
|
Post by allensh on Jul 27, 2011 12:05:51 GMT -5
I read somewhere about a "conversion chart" for this set to be used with LOW. Is this actually needed? Allen Nope. Idea got scrapped when it was decided the guys were statted just right that they fit into the whole LOW/LOTF universe as is. No conversion chart needed. Glad to hear that. Allen
|
|
|
Post by mwjergs on Aug 31, 2011 22:53:02 GMT -5
Finally picked up the set.
Love the color cards.
I do have a few questions and comments.
There are still plenty of specialty moves that are unaccounted for in the handbook. I saw a thread for this already but it still doesn't answer the question.
Also why was there a need for two Delirious cards (aside from the mask color changes) when they are identical in terms if moveset? Doesn't make much sense.
I am looking forward to adding a few guys to my fed to see how they play.
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Sept 1, 2011 10:14:40 GMT -5
Finally picked up the set. Love the color cards. I do have a few questions and comments. There are still plenty of specialty moves that are unaccounted for in the handbook. I saw a thread for this already but it still doesn't answer the question. Also why was there a need for two Delirious cards (aside from the mask color changes) when they are identical in terms if moveset? Doesn't make much sense. 1) A thread with all the specialty moves could be cool. Or maybe a thread with youtube clips of all the guys in the set. Most guys can be searched under "Top 10 moves" or something similar. Like any other wrestlers in LOW/LOTF a little research might be needed to get the full picture. Even I forget sometimes what some of the moves are. 2) In short, yes. The 2nd Delirious was added literally at last second at the request of a powerful guy. For what it's worth Delirious does not wrestle any differently as a heel than he does as a face, which is why the stats are the same. Really the plan was for 26 cards and at the eleventh hour the green Delirious was added as the 27th card. So call it a bonus card. It's not like if there weren't 2 Delirious cards someone else would have gotten the spot.
|
|
|
Post by pikemojo on Sept 2, 2011 22:05:45 GMT -5
I read somewhere about a "conversion chart" for this set to be used with LOW. Is this actually needed? Allen Nope. Idea got scrapped when it was decided the guys were statted just right that they fit into the whole LOW/LOTF universe as is. No conversion chart needed. So, I haven't actually purchased the set yet. I fully plan on it but just haven't gotten around to it yet. Was kinda hoping I would get it for my bday but didn't so I will have to buy it myself. I do question the message that they will fit right in with the LOTF/LOW cards we already have. The guys on the lower end of the spectrum seem fine but guys like Claudio would be more powerful than the majority of our current main eventers. I am simply looking at Rahl Ratings but they have always been a pretty good measure of a cards strength. I keep thinking that because of this I will have to run Chikara separate from everything else, which is fine, but it would be nice to be able to mix wrestlers in and out of Chikara. I am curious how the others who have been playing with the cards for a while feel about it?
|
|
|
Post by mwjergs on Sept 3, 2011 8:41:44 GMT -5
Finally picked up the set. Love the color cards. I do have a few questions and comments. There are still plenty of specialty moves that are unaccounted for in the handbook. I saw a thread for this already but it still doesn't answer the question. Also why was there a need for two Delirious cards (aside from the mask color changes) when they are identical in terms if moveset? Doesn't make much sense. 1) A thread with all the specialty moves could be cool. Or maybe a thread with youtube clips of all the guys in the set. Most guys can be searched under "Top 10 moves" or something similar. Like any other wrestlers in LOW/LOTF a little research might be needed to get the full picture. Even I forget sometimes what some of the moves are. 2) In short, yes. The 2nd Delirious was added literally at last second at the request of a powerful guy. For what it's worth Delirious does not wrestle any differently as a heel than he does as a face, which is why the stats are the same. Really the plan was for 26 cards and at the eleventh hour the green Delirious was added as the 27th card. So call it a bonus card. It's not like if there weren't 2 Delirious cards someone else would have gotten the spot. I see. I understand that it wasn't as if someone else's spot was getting taken. I just think it's funny that I could choose from 4 Delirious cards now to wrestle a match and two are exactly the same.
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Sept 3, 2011 9:00:45 GMT -5
If and when FG does a color ROH set that gives us another opportunity to crank out another Delirious card. My personal goal is to eventually put out more Delirious cards that Alpha Force and Tauran combined.
|
|
|
Post by marktaggart on Sept 3, 2011 17:13:19 GMT -5
If and when FG does a color ROH set that gives us another opportunity to crank out another Delirious card. My personal goal is to eventually put out more Delirious cards that Alpha Force and Tauran combined. I support this goal. I still need a color card of "red poison" Delirious. As Picard would say, "make it so".
|
|